Posts: 10332
Threads: 31
Joined: April 3, 2015
Reputation:
64
RE: The Plato Thread
November 8, 2021 at 9:33 pm
(November 6, 2021 at 10:46 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: More partial to Plotinus myself but still curious to see where the discussion leads.
So, just out of interest, and I'll try not to go off-topic long (fao vulc ), is Plotinus related to all of this (ie Aquinas etc), or something completely different? I have to say, I've never heard of him, but if you'd recommend reading him, either for the sake of Aquinas or for other reasons, I'll happily add him to my ever-growing reading list
Posts: 5813
Threads: 86
Joined: November 19, 2017
Reputation:
59
RE: The Plato Thread
November 8, 2021 at 9:46 pm
(This post was last modified: November 8, 2021 at 11:12 pm by vulcanlogician.)
My favorite literature professor had a poster that hung over his door:
"The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be ignited." --Plotinus
That's pretty much the only Plotinus that I know. I've never read any of his works. But that quote is fucking awesome.
Posts: 10332
Threads: 31
Joined: April 3, 2015
Reputation:
64
RE: The Plato Thread
November 8, 2021 at 10:01 pm
(This post was last modified: November 8, 2021 at 10:02 pm by emjay.)
(November 8, 2021 at 9:46 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: My favorite literature professor had a poster than hung over his door:
"The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be ignited." --Plotinus
That's pretty much the only Plotinus that I know. I've never read any of his works. But that quote is fucking awesome.
I definitely get the vessel part... cos our capacity to learn or absorb seems to be pretty much limitless... but much less clear on what the fire might be referring to, unless it's perhaps something like the flux we've been talking about before... but sounds like probably not since the flux of sensation etc is not really something we ignite ourselves (ie it's already lit ). Obviously that's just my first impression/interpretation of it, but yeah, I agree it sounds a pretty cool quote and I'm curious to see how you and Neo interpret it. I guess it just means curiosity?
Posts: 5813
Threads: 86
Joined: November 19, 2017
Reputation:
59
RE: The Plato Thread
November 8, 2021 at 10:03 pm
A filled vessel is a static thing. The flame is an active, alive, and dynamic thing.
Posts: 10332
Threads: 31
Joined: April 3, 2015
Reputation:
64
RE: The Plato Thread
November 8, 2021 at 10:08 pm
(November 8, 2021 at 10:03 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: A filled vessel is a static thing. The flame is an active, alive, and dynamic thing.
Fair enough.... seems similar to what I was saying but also different. Anyhoo, I'll call it a night now, so thanks for the chat, and night night
Posts: 8711
Threads: 128
Joined: March 1, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: The Plato Thread
November 8, 2021 at 11:11 pm
(This post was last modified: November 8, 2021 at 11:12 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
Swedenborg is the mystic side of Plotinus with whom I sympathize. We all arise out of the One to which every thing returns.
<insert profound quote here>
Posts: 7259
Threads: 506
Joined: December 12, 2015
Reputation:
22
RE: The Plato Thread
November 9, 2021 at 12:29 am
(November 8, 2021 at 7:30 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: (November 8, 2021 at 7:00 pm)Jehanne Wrote: Audible has a dramatic reading of The Republic, which is fantastic. It's a bit pricey at $24.99, but, you could always join, get your free book, and then quit! (What would Plato say to this scheming??)
So what do you think of it?
I loved the dramatic reading! As for The Republic, well, it was way ahead of its time, but, quite scary in terms of some of its propositions. I liked the suggestion about organized physical education (i.e., "gym class", I suppose). Maybe our society would not be so obese if the State would mandate such for all citizens.
Posts: 8711
Threads: 128
Joined: March 1, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: The Plato Thread
November 10, 2021 at 11:06 pm
(This post was last modified: November 10, 2021 at 11:09 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
I clearly see the value of understanding Plato on his own terms...At the same time, when I read ancient and Medieval philosophy, my modern personal sensibilities want to constantly reinterpret what is in the text with what seems relevant to my life at the moment. Serious reflection on issues of philosophy seems useful for practicing critical thinking skills but more practically is also learning really useful ways to categorize things. For example in one dialog Socrates makes a big deal about the difference between gymnastics, which produces real health as opposed to cosmetics, which produces the apparent health. My personal perspective mentally translates this into the difference between presentation and authenticity. IMHO the Scholastic distinction between accidental and essential needs some updating, too. Perhaps having something to do with supervenience.
<insert profound quote here>
|