Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 25, 2024, 1:25 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
#21
RE: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
(December 5, 2011 at 10:04 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: Are you for real? You have to be a Poe. Nobody can possibly be this much of a blithering fucktard and still know how to use a computer.

I refuted your argument, dp. You can pretend I didn't, and you can pretend to stand on some kind of pedestal of intellectual superiority, but it's fairly obvious from your vacuous reply that you are left with nothing else but empty rhetoric.
Reply
#22
RE: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
(December 5, 2011 at 10:20 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:Are you for real? You have to be a Poe. Nobody can possibly be this much of a blithering fucktard and still know how to use a computer.


I disagree, D-P. I think he really is that fucking stupid.

Yeah, sad to say the depth of Christian fucktardary has no known floor. Just when you think you've reached the deepest level possible, they find a way to dive to new undiscovered reaches.

Maybe I should try a different approach...
(December 5, 2011 at 11:21 pm)lucent Wrote:
(December 5, 2011 at 10:04 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: Are you for real? You have to be a Poe. Nobody can possibly be this much of a blithering fucktard and still know how to use a computer.

I refuted your argument, dp. You can pretend I didn't, and you can pretend to stand on some kind of pedestal of intellectual superiority, but it's fairly obvious from your vacuous reply that you are left with nothing else but empty rhetoric.

In the name of Nature's God and Sweet Reason, I command the foul demons of stupidity to begone! Release this mind, what remains of it, and return from the pit of stupidity from whence you came!

The power of Reason compels you, vile demons of willful ignorance!

The power of Reason compels you, sinister spirits of brainwashing!

The power of Reason compels you, fiendish foes that fetch fucktardary.

Begone and trouble this innocent but feeble mind no more!

The power of Reason compels you! The power of Reason compels you! The power...
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply
#23
RE: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
(December 5, 2011 at 11:43 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:
(December 5, 2011 at 10:20 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:Are you for real? You have to be a Poe. Nobody can possibly be this much of a blithering fucktard and still know how to use a computer.


I disagree, D-P. I think he really is that fucking stupid.

Yeah, sad to say the depth of Christian fucktardary has no known floor. Just when you think you've reached the deepest level possible, they find a way to dive to new undiscovered reaches.

Maybe I should try a different approach...
(December 5, 2011 at 11:21 pm)lucent Wrote:
(December 5, 2011 at 10:04 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: Are you for real? You have to be a Poe. Nobody can possibly be this much of a blithering fucktard and still know how to use a computer.

I refuted your argument, dp. You can pretend I didn't, and you can pretend to stand on some kind of pedestal of intellectual superiority, but it's fairly obvious from your vacuous reply that you are left with nothing else but empty rhetoric.

In the name of Nature's God and Sweet Reason, I command the foul demons of stupidity to begone! Release this mind, what remains of it, and return from the pit of stupidity from whence you came!

The power of Reason compels you, vile demons of willful ignorance!

The power of Reason compels you, sinister spirits of brainwashing!

The power of Reason compels you, fiendish foes that fetch fucktardary.

Begone and trouble this innocent but feeble mind no more!

The power of Reason compels you! The power of Reason compels you! The power...

I rest my case.

Reply
#24
RE: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
We need one of the mods to make us a banner or something out of this, D-P.

[Image: Dogbert.jpg]

With all the idiotic believers running around loose we have good need of it.
Reply
#25
RE: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
(December 5, 2011 at 11:52 pm)lucent Wrote: I rest my case.

Good. Hopefully you will shut up for ever, and fuck off.

You are currently experiencing a lucky and very brief window of awareness, sandwiched in between two periods of timeless and utter nothingness. So why not make the most of it, and stop wasting your life away trying to convince other people that there is something else? The reality is obvious.

Reply
#26
RE: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
lucent is perhaps the greatest comedian around.
Cunt
Reply
#27
RE: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
He makes Statler Waldorf look scholarly, smart and rational.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply
#28
RE: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
1.) Science by definition is falsifiable and therefore has the ability to be wrong.
- The example given in the video is a perfect case of this occurring. It has been observed that particles can and do travel faster than the speed of light. It has also been observed that space has [edit:] the capability of traveling faster than the speed of light. The theory of relativity is not as simple as the video wished to make it seem.

2.) Philosophy by definition is mostly always wrong, but none-the-less is the cause of most, if not all, natural and physical sciences.
- As was stated many times earlier, an argument is only sound if the premises are true. It is possible for a philosophical explanation to be logically sound which would give it equal weight to any reasoned scientific explanation.

In short, science and philosophy are both able to be wrong, neither has the upper hand in a conversation of existence or causality unless one is not logically sound. Empirical evidence is not proof of (non)existence, nor is predictive evidence based on past observations. If you want an explanation as to why then look into cosmology or any science really, and observe how many times it has been wrong. Our knowledge is current and we would be naive to believe that we can say anything with complete truth.
Brevity is the soul of wit.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Good Arguments (Certainty vs. Probability) JAG 12 1441 October 8, 2020 at 10:30 pm
Last Post: Sal
  Best arguments for or against God's existence mcc1789 22 3637 May 22, 2019 at 9:16 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Are Atheists using Intellectually Dishonest Arguments? vulcanlogician 223 37529 April 9, 2018 at 5:56 pm
Last Post: KevinM1
  Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency datc 386 53770 December 1, 2017 at 2:07 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  Valid Arguments for God (soundness disputed) Mystic 17 2678 March 25, 2017 at 2:54 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Pre vs. Post Death henryp 31 4555 July 2, 2016 at 9:51 pm
Last Post: RetiredArmy
  Arguments for God from a purely philosophical perspective Aegon 13 3390 January 24, 2016 at 2:44 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Hume weakened analogical arguments for God. Pizza 18 6522 March 25, 2015 at 6:13 pm
Last Post: Pyrrho
  Gaps in theistic arguments. Secular theism vs religious theism Pizza 59 12785 February 27, 2015 at 12:33 am
Last Post: The Reality Salesman01
  Practical Applications of Apologetic Logic DeistPaladin 5 1775 July 28, 2014 at 7:53 pm
Last Post: ShaMan



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)