Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 24, 2024, 3:04 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A weird bug in the preprocessor of PicoBlaze Simulator in JavaScript
#71
RE: A weird bug in the preprocessor of PicoBlaze Simulator in JavaScript
(October 18, 2023 at 5:46 am)arewethereyet Wrote: So, we are done here?

Well, I was planning to learn some PHP and make a back-end to my PicoBlaze Simulator so that the users can share their own PicoBlaze programs. However, I am again having mental health issues, so I likely won't be able to do that any time soon.
Reply
#72
RE: A weird bug in the preprocessor of PicoBlaze Simulator in JavaScript
(October 18, 2023 at 10:02 am)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(October 18, 2023 at 5:46 am)arewethereyet Wrote: So, we are done here?

Well, I was planning to learn some PHP and make a back-end to my PicoBlaze Simulator so that the users can share their own PicoBlaze programs. However, I am again still having mental health issues, so I likely won't be able to do that any time soon.

Fixed that for you.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#73
RE: A weird bug in the preprocessor of PicoBlaze Simulator in JavaScript
(October 18, 2023 at 11:21 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(October 18, 2023 at 10:02 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: Well, I was planning to learn some PHP and make a back-end to my PicoBlaze Simulator so that the users can share their own PicoBlaze programs. However, I am again still having mental health issues, so I likely won't be able to do that any time soon.

Fixed that for you.

Boru

I mean I am having panic attacks four times in the last five days, which didn't happen to me for over a year.
Reply
#74
RE: A weird bug in the preprocessor of PicoBlaze Simulator in JavaScript
A few days ago, I noticed a very serious bug in the preprocessor of my PicoBlaze assembler. Namely, if the user misspells a preprocessor directive (e.g. `costant` instead of `constant`) inside a `while` loop or an `if` branching, the preprocessor would fail silently. So, I made
Administrator Notice
Link removed/advertising.
.
Reply
#75
RE: A weird bug in the preprocessor of PicoBlaze Simulator in JavaScript
(December 17, 2023 at 7:53 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: A few days ago, I noticed a very serious bug in the preprocessor of my PicoBlaze assembler. Namely, if the user misspells a preprocessor directive (e.g. `costant` instead of `constant`) inside a `while` loop or an `if` branching, the preprocessor would fail silently. So, I made
Administrator Notice
Link removed from quite as it was in original post.  Advertising.
Several large universities have devices called 'scanning tunneling microscopes (SCMs). Based on the principle of quantum tunneling, these devices are able to distinguish objects smaller than 0.1 nanometres, with a resolution approaching 0.01 nanometres. As a result, they can routinely image - and even manipulate - individual atoms.

And yet, even in the hands of an experienced operator working under ideal conditions, they would be unable to detect my level of interest in your piddly-arsed PicoBlaze assembler problems.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#76
RE: A weird bug in the preprocessor of PicoBlaze Simulator in JavaScript
(December 17, 2023 at 7:53 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: A few days ago, I noticed a very serious bug in the preprocessor of my PicoBlaze assembler. Namely, if the user misspells a preprocessor directive (e.g. `costant` instead of `constant`) inside a `while` loop or an `if` branching, the preprocessor would fail silently. So, I made
Administrator Notice
Link removed as in the original post. Advertising.

I am amazed that you continue to labor under the delusion that anyone here has even the tiniest of fucks to give about any of your mindless yammering.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
#77
RE: A weird bug in the preprocessor of PicoBlaze Simulator in JavaScript
(December 17, 2023 at 11:07 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(December 17, 2023 at 7:53 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: A few days ago, I noticed a very serious bug in the preprocessor of my PicoBlaze assembler. Namely, if the user misspells a preprocessor directive (e.g. `costant` instead of `constant`) inside a `while` loop or an `if` branching, the preprocessor would fail silently. So, I made
Administrator Notice
Link removed. Advertising.
Several large universities have devices called 'scanning tunneling microscopes (SCMs). Based on the principle of quantum tunneling, these devices are able to distinguish objects smaller than 0.1 nanometres, with a resolution approaching 0.01 nanometres. As a result, they can routinely image - and even manipulate - individual atoms.

And yet, even in the hands of an experienced operator working under ideal conditions, they would be unable to detect my level of interest in your piddly-arsed PicoBlaze assembler problems.

Boru
You need to understand that, unfortunately, my PicoBlaze assembler and emulator is not the only PicoBlaze assembler and emulator in active development. Unless I constantly update it and link to it on various websites, when somebody types "PicoBlaze Simulator" into the search engine (Google, Bing...), some other PicoBlaze assembler and emulator is going to come up first.
Reply
#78
RE: A weird bug in the preprocessor of PicoBlaze Simulator in JavaScript
So you put links to your buggy program on here to hopefully get clicks? Sounds a bit like advertising to me...which is against the rules. We aren't your SEO.
[Image: MmQV79M.png]  
                                      
Reply
#79
RE: A weird bug in the preprocessor of PicoBlaze Simulator in JavaScript
(December 18, 2023 at 5:58 am)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(December 17, 2023 at 11:07 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Several large universities have devices called 'scanning tunneling microscopes (SCMs). Based on the principle of quantum tunneling, these devices are able to distinguish objects smaller than 0.1 nanometres, with a resolution approaching 0.01 nanometres. As a result, they can routinely image - and even manipulate - individual atoms.

And yet, even in the hands of an experienced operator working under ideal conditions, they would be unable to detect my level of interest in your piddly-arsed PicoBlaze assembler problems.

Boru
You need to understand that, unfortunately, my PicoBlaze assembler and emulator is not the only PicoBlaze assembler and emulator in active development. Unless I constantly update it and link to it on various websites, when somebody types "PicoBlaze Simulator" into the search engine (Google, Bing...), some other PicoBlaze assembler and emulator is going to come up first.

You need to understand that advertising is not permitted on this forum.

Boru

Edit: yeah, what awty said.
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#80
RE: A weird bug in the preprocessor of PicoBlaze Simulator in JavaScript
(December 18, 2023 at 7:49 am)arewethereyet Wrote: So you put links to your buggy program on here to hopefully get clicks? Sounds a bit like advertising to me...which is against the rules. We aren't your SEO.
Well, it is certainly getting less buggy over time.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  PicoBlaze Simulator in JavaScript FlatAssembler 80 12614 June 23, 2023 at 5:20 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Reformatting tools for JavaScript FlatAssembler 0 449 June 14, 2020 at 10:13 am
Last Post: FlatAssembler
  Android bug fear in 900 million phones account_inactive 0 664 August 8, 2016 at 6:31 am
Last Post: account_inactive
  Anatomy of religion in RELIGION SIMULATOR game gravitysoftware 12 3370 February 8, 2015 at 12:52 pm
Last Post: c172
  Analysis of a Facebook social engineering/Javascript "hack" Autumnlicious 4 3492 March 2, 2011 at 9:29 am
Last Post: fr0d0



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)