I will prove to you that God exists

[The Architect Of Fate]

I've always said he is an atheist dimwit. He substitutes an infinitude of universes over a Creator.

No he doesn't and the only dimwit is the guy claiming he does

[The Architect Of Fate]

I assume you're referring to the person who first used the word idiot.

No they are referring to you for obvious reasons

[The Architect Of Fate]

Then I made a mistake a few days ago.

No you always were

[Drew_2013]

And just think yesterday you didn't know how to spell idiot and now you're using it in a sentence. Bravo.

And you have the audacity to block others for being offensive. Fucking Hypocrite!

He can block me so you can. Fucking Jerk.

Moderator Notice
Cool it.

[The Architect Of Fate]

I accept the fine-tuning of motherboards as a brute fact because they are intentionally designed to come out fine-tuned for computing. The fact they are caused to be fine-tuned doesn't mean they're not fine-tuned.

I think you get this now only a person of low intelligence would fail to see it.

Gibberish and false analogies

[The Architect Of Fate]

He can block me so you can. Fucking Jerk.

We don't block people because were not cowards

[Nay_Sayer]

Drew you're going to have to try harder with your tantrum.

[Angrboda]

In Just Six Numbers, Martin Rees does not use the phrase begging the question a single time.   I'll need an actual quotation before I comment on this.

Given that I've just shown you misrepresenting Martin Rees, it's not a stretch to imagine that you are doing so again.

(Other words Martin Rees doesn't use as you've used them here:  'solve', 'problem', 'push', and 'back'.)

If the underlying laws determine all the key numbers uniquely, so that no other universe is mathematically consistent with those laws, then we would have to accept that the ‘tuning’ was a brute fact, or providence. - MR

I accept the fine-tuning of motherboards as a brute fact because they are intentionally designed to come out fine-tuned for computing. The fact they are caused to be fine-tuned doesn't mean they're not fine-tuned.

I think you get this now only a person of low intelligence would fail to see it.

Can you provide a quote to back up your claim about Rees' book or not?

[Sheldon]

In Just Six Numbers, Martin Rees does not use the phrase begging the question a single time.   I'll need an actual quotation before I comment on this.

Given that I've just shown you misrepresenting Martin Rees, it's not a stretch to imagine that you are doing so again.

(Other words Martin Rees doesn't use as you've used them here:  'solve', 'problem', 'push', and 'back'.)

If the underlying laws determine all the key numbers uniquely, so that no other universe is mathematically consistent with those laws, then we would have to accept that the ‘tuning’ was a brute fact, or providence. - MR

I accept the fine-tuning of motherboards as a brute fact because they are intentionally designed to come out fine-tuned for computing. The fact they are caused to be fine-tuned doesn't mean they're not fine-tuned.

I think you get this now only a person of low intelligence would fail to see it.

False equivalence fallacy, still. Motherboards are not the same as the universe..."only a person of low intelligence would fail to see it." Or a dishonest troll of course. 

[Nay_Sayer]

Moderator Notice
 Ease up on the name calling. This goes for everyone.  Attack the argument not the arguer.   We can handle it if he goes full kamakazi