Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 17, 2024, 1:20 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Any Evidence For A Historical Jesus?
RE: Any Evidence For A Historical Jesus?
Glenn M Miller:

Quote:Glenn M. Miller, committed evangelical disciple of Jesus Christ for the last40 years of my life, research/writer/speaker, IT business executive, father of three gifted, delightful, over-stimulated, people--all seeking, questioning, open-minded, authentic people [one lives in Philly, one lives in heaven, and one lives in Ft. Collins CO]. Amateur philosopher, theologian, divorced (still a little ashamed, but forgiven), mild MaiTai-er, extreme empathetic, serious but passionate about the deep issues of life/existence. I currently live in Mississippi.


Sounds like a complete dickhead to me.

I can see why morons would fall all over him just as they do with anyone who tells them that their fucking fairy tales are true.

Kindly go fuck yourself and your Tectonics stable of horseshit. What's next from you? Answersingenesis?
Reply
RE: Any Evidence For A Historical Jesus?
Minimalist Wrote:Another of your gems that I missed, chippy.

Try this and see if you can understand it ( which I doubt.) People LIE. They lie for a lot of reasons. When they are not deliberately lying they are frequently wrong. If they are wrong sometimes it is because they are misled by sources and sometimes they simply do not know WTF they are talking about. Sometimes, they just made shit up to advance the story.

Julius Caesar, in his Commentarii de Bello Gallico (Commentaries on the Gallic War) claims that 250,000 Gauls came as a reinforcement to relieve the siege of Alesia. According to you, chippy, the simple fact that Caesar wrote this down makes it true. We should not question it. The number is fucking absurd. But it makes great propaganda which is what The Gallic War was all about. Caesar wasn't writing for his own troops. Most of them were illiterate. He wasn't writing for the Gauls who did not speak Latin. Caesar was writing to energize his supporters in Rome and scare the shit out of the senatorial party.

sorry it took me so long to respond, i have a life. and oh that's a great arguement. people lie. that's great... except for a few other fundamental truths. people lie, but not about the same thing. not about things they disagree with. there are believers and non believers alike who are writting about him during his time. not one of them claim he didn't exist, they actually claimed the opposite. they just deny his miricles and his resurection. even the jews who all hated him at the time claim he existed. this is the difference. if this was in fact a lie, it would be the biggest scam in history. i don't think anyone could make a scam for people to believe for thousands of years. i don't thing people could completely make a person up and make up events that happened to them including interactions with very important people and make people believe it then yet alone for centuries later.

Minimalist Wrote:So here we have examples of lying for propaganda. With Herodotus we also have the story of how 100,000 slaves labored for 20 years to build the pyramids. This story was told by his Egyptian guide who had no idea how the pyramids were built. Herodotus was simply misled.

Livy recounts the tale of Trojans escaping Troy and fleeing to Italy. Is that true because Livy wrote it? He also wrote about Romulus and Remus being shoved in a basket and put into a river( sound familiar????) and saved by a wolf. I guess you believe that too because, WTF, its written down?

I'm hoping by this point you have gotten the hint. Virtually everything written by ancient historians must be taken cum grano salis. As the noted British scholar, Philip Davies has noted, literacy in the ancient world was so rare that one must not only consider the agenda of the author but also the point of view of the intended audience. I fully expect that someone like you who is so invested in a book of fairy tales will be unable to grasp the significance of what Davies is talking about.

look, yes there are things people can write about that are completely made up because no one was there to see it. but, these were very famous events that took place that had quite a few witnesses. there are many that confirm these events and none who deny them. the Jews deny his works but not the existance of the man himself. you can't bring one person who did but i bet you could bring many who wrote about him during his time who hated him.

Minimalist Wrote:And its far more likely that he is talking about Jesus bar Damneus, anyway

oh yes because he's the father of christianity isn't he? ok...

it seams that my debate was overtaken so i'll leave whatever Fpvpilot is talking about to him. i'm staying out of that one.
Oh! thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand
Between their loved home and the war's desolation!
Blest with victory and peace, may the heav'n rescued land
Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation.
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: "In God is our trust."
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!

-4th verse of the american national anthem
Reply
RE: Any Evidence For A Historical Jesus?
I'm impressed by one thing, chippy. You apparently have the ability to read with a total lack of comprehension.

I think you can forget about the other asshole. D-P exposed him for the Tektonics spouting jackass he is. He seems to have fled.
Reply
RE: Any Evidence For A Historical Jesus?
(January 13, 2012 at 1:05 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I'm impressed by one thing, chippy. You apparently have the ability to read with a total lack of comprehension.

I think you can forget about the other asshole. D-P exposed him for the Tektonics spouting jackass he is. He seems to have fled.

Is he one of Holding's boys? Figures. Doing the bait-and-switch seems common practice for them as they try to tilt the playing field as much as they can get away with.
(January 10, 2012 at 10:36 pm)Fpvpilot Wrote: I’m sorry if I upset you.

You didn't. I was simply commenting on your dishonesty.

Quote:I just wanted you to substantiate your assertions. That’s all. I will leave you alone now. Hopefully, as time permits in the coming months, we will be able to converse again.

You are still welcome to debate me on the historical Jesus and I will school you on what your own holy book says. You may be surprised.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply
RE: Any Evidence For A Historical Jesus?
Chiapan,

Here are a few reasons why your sources are bogus.

Suetonius and Pliny the Younger do mention Jesus (if they are authentic and not Christian interpolations) but fact is they are both much to late to distinguish between Christ and Christianity.

On Tacitus:

1. There are no quotes of this passage by any of the church fathers.
2. Tertullian was familar with all the writings of Tactius and if this passage existed it would have been cited as an answer to his arguments (Chapter 5 of Tertullian's Apology and Chapter 21 of the same).
3. In the beginning of the 3rd century Clement of Alexandria compiled a list of all references from Pagan writers to Jesus and Tactius is missing from it.
4. Origen in his arguments with Celsus would have referred to it had it existed.
5. Eusibius in the 4th century did the same as Clement of Alexandria and once again, no mention of Tactius.
6. The first quotation of it by a Christian writer was in the 15th century.
7. At the time of the quotation it was said only one copy of the Annals existed and it was made 600 years after Tactius died.
8. Conveniently, this single existing copy was in the possession of a Christian so insertion of a forged passage would have been extremely easy.
9. The story about the orgies of Nero do not read anything like the writing of Tactius.
10. This story is almost word for word in the writing of Sulpicus Severus who was a Christian in the 5th century but there were no references to Jesus.
11. Suetonius, a Roman historian, who condemned Nero heavily even tells us Nero took care not to sacrifice a human life, not even of a convicted criminal.
12. Tactius even claims at the time of the fire that Nero was not in Rome but in Antium.

These are just a few reasons that scholars see this passage from Annals as nothing to be reckoned with as it most probably is a forgery in the same vein as Josephus' Testimonium and at best it is nothing more than heresay.

On Josephus:

The Testimonium was not written by Josephus and there are many reasons in the text itself. One example is that in the text Jesus is called the messiah yet Josephus remained an observant Jew and never became a Christian therefore he could not have called Jesus the messiah. Secondly, there are 3 different manuscript of the Testimonium and as expected, the later manuscripts have more details than the earlier ones as if the story evolved with time. Third and EXTREMELY DAMNING is that there were no references to it nor was it even mentioned in any writing until the 4th century when Constantine appointed Eusibius official church historian (Eusebius is the suspected author of the Testimonium) Fourth and a final nail in the Testimonium's coffin is textual analysis of the text with Josephus known writing shows certain phrase and words that were not used by Josephus but were found in the writing of only one church historian by the name of Eusibius.

And to have a little fun at your expense can you tell me who this passage is written about?

In the 1st century at the east end of the Mediterranean there was a man who taught the worship of the one true god and declared that god didn't want sacrifice but charity and piety. He also taught to avoid hatred. He supposedly performed miracles by raising the dead, healing the sick and casting out demons. Some of his followers called him the son of god although he called himself the son of man. He was accused of sedition by Rome, arrested and executed. After his execution his disciples said he was resurrected, appeared to them and then ascended to heaven.

(January 1, 2012 at 12:36 am)chipan Wrote: the only artifact we have is the shroud of torrin which people argue is the actual shroud that Jeses was burried with.
The shroud of urine is a well known forgery.
Quote: any works of carpentry how would we know they're his?
Are you serious? Carpenter is a well known Rabbinic idiom meaning an expert on scripture. Do yourself a favor and learn something of early Christian history before you make yourself look sillier than you already have.
Reply
RE: Any Evidence For A Historical Jesus?
(January 9, 2012 at 11:51 am)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:The only relevence in Josephus's account is to him being the brother of James,


And its far more likely that he is talking about Jesus bar Damneus, anyway.

Considering that is what the passage says, it's a pretty certain bet.
Reply
RE: Any Evidence For A Historical Jesus?
Did you ever notice in that passage that Josephus never actually says that "James" was stoned. Just that he was delivered over to be stoned.

Meanwhile, other citizens went to the king (Herod Agrippa II) who was probably two blocks away and it couldn't have taken that long to get there.

Josephus is never one to suppress the body count in his writings. Just seems like an odd omission.
Reply
RE: Any Evidence For A Historical Jesus?
The whole biblical studies profession is so infected with people with an inherent bias towards trying to prove that Jesus Christ was at least based on a historical character, that anybody who argues that Jesus Christ is a mythical character like Hercules is dismissed as a crackpot. It is like if creationists dominated the ranks of scientists in the biological sciences. So I have little respect for a lot of biblical scholars, because of that bias which leads them to desperate tactics such as special pleading and cheating.

In reality outside the new testament there is nil credible evidence for the existence of Jesus in the first decades after his supposed death. All we have is one disputed very short paragraph in the Jewish historian Josephus. Even Roman sources such as Pliny the Younger, Tacitus and are just relaying what Christians were saying about the origins of their religion at the time.

Also there is no evidence in the letters of the New Testament for an actual Jesus either. Because epistles portray a Jesus who never came down to earth in the first place. Rather he was a heavenly being who was killed by the demonic forces in some sphere of the heavens. That would account for the lack of quotes of something Jesus said or at least putting words into his mouth in order give authority to their arguments, which otherwise would be seen as quite odd. For instance in 1 Corinthians 7 why did not the writer quote the words attributed to Jesus in Matthew 19 to support the argument the writer is making.

Since the epistles were written before the Gospels, the gospels can be seen as an attempt to historicist a mythological character. So the writers of the gospels created a life story for Jesus using elements from Hellenistic literature such as the Iliad, Midrash of various Old Testament verses and not to mention the works of Josephus. Also if the Gospels are actually rehashes of other works, that makes them not reliable at all when they come to historical records.
undefined
Reply
RE: Any Evidence For A Historical Jesus?
Justtristo Wrote:Also there is no evidence in the letters of the New Testament for an actual Jesus either. Because epistles portray a Jesus who never came down to earth in the first place.
I'm fairly new to the idea that Paul wrote his letters before the Gospels. I don't understand how that works out... Does that mean he single-handedly invented the name and character of Jesus?
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
Reply
RE: Any Evidence For A Historical Jesus?
Quote:2 Corinthians 11:32-33

New International Version (NIV)
32 In Damascus the governor under King Aretas had the city of the Damascenes guarded in order to arrest me. 33 But I was lowered in a basket from a window in the wall and slipped through his hands.


This describes an actual historical situation. Aretas of Nabatea did rule Damascus. Unfortunately for xtians, he ruled it between 84 and 64 BC.

They usually give this one a great big leaving alone because it fucks up their whole story line!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Can someone show me the evidence of the bullshit bible articles? I believe in Harry Potter 36 5875 November 3, 2019 at 7:33 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  If evidence for god is in abundance, why is faith necessary? Silver 181 42953 November 11, 2017 at 10:11 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Atheists don't realize asking for evidence of God is a strawman ErGingerbreadMandude 240 33441 November 10, 2017 at 3:11 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
Question Why do you people say there is no evidence,when you can't be bothered to look for it? Jaguar 74 23269 November 5, 2017 at 7:17 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Personal evidence Silver 19 6655 November 4, 2017 at 12:27 pm
Last Post: c152
  Is Accepting Christian Evidence Special Pleading? SteveII 768 268788 September 28, 2017 at 10:42 pm
Last Post: Kernel Sohcahtoa
  Do Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence? SteveII 643 155816 August 12, 2017 at 1:36 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  Any one else watch The Last Days of Jesus on PBS ? vorlon13 9 2870 April 16, 2017 at 12:24 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Evidence: The Gathering Randy Carson 530 101858 September 25, 2015 at 5:14 pm
Last Post: abaris
  With Science and Archaeology and Miracle's evidence for God TheThinkingCatholic 35 12138 September 20, 2015 at 11:32 am
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)