Evolution

[Faith No More]

If you want proof, then explain to me what you are looking for. If you can not then know you will not accept anything i provide on principle rather than merit.

Don't pretend like you know me or what I would or would not accept. It's already been explained that anything backing up your hypothesis would do, but clearly you are unwilling to do so. I'm so fucking tired of your stupid, immature games that are clearly a diversion from actually having to defend your ideas. Your hypothesis obviously fails simply on the lack of evidence, and I really don't care for anything more you have to say on the subject.

If you grow up, maybe a discussion can follow.

[Jackalope]

When I followed up and ask what kind of proof they were looking for? no one knew for sure.

Liar.

I didn't give you specific

If you did not or could not provide what I ask no matter what the reason then explain to me how i lied.

Way to trim that quote to the point where it's completely devoid of context, fuckhead.

It was Rhythm, if I recall correctly, who mentioned specifically what one would expect to find in DNA evidence if your "hypothesis" is correct. Yet, you claim "no one was sure" what evidence they were looking for. Liar.

I told you I wanted to hear your demonstrable evidence. That's specific enough for anyone else around here who is making material claims. I made a point to keep an open mind, and was willing to examine whatever demonstrable evidence you could produce.

But it seems that all you want to do is play childish fucking games and blame those who you would try to convince that your failure to produce evidence is somehow thier fault.

It doesn't work that way, shit-for-brains.

GDIAF.

[popeyespappy]

Both of you bible-thumping morons had best take heed. Science is passing you by.

(You and your fucking "god!)


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/201...215607.htm

Blank and colleagues at the Bay Area Environmental Research Institute NASA/Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif., set out to check whether amino acids could remain intact after a comet's descent through Earth's atmosphere. Previous analyses of comet dust samples returned to Earth by a NASA spacecraft eliminated any doubt that amino acids do occur in comets.

Their experiments show that not only could the amino acids survive, but the heat and pressure enabled the amino acids to create the peptide bonds needed to fuse them into proteins.

The amino acids did not break down due to the heat and shock of the simulated crash. Indeed, they began forming the so-called "peptide bonds" that link amino acids together into proteins. The pressure from the impact of the crash apparently offset the intense heat and also supplied the energy needed to create the peptides, she explained. In other experiments, Blank's team used sophisticated computer models to simulate conditions as comets collided with Earth.

[R-e-n-n-a-t]

Both of you bible-thumping morons had best take heed. Science is passing you by.

(You and your fucking "god!)


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/201...215607.htm

Blank and colleagues at the Bay Area Environmental Research Institute NASA/Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif., set out to check whether amino acids could remain intact after a comet's descent through Earth's atmosphere. Previous analyses of comet dust samples returned to Earth by a NASA spacecraft eliminated any doubt that amino acids do occur in comets.

A wonderful article. 'Tis a shame they'll ignore it completely. Just watch.

[Minimalist]

Stupid people are incapable of understanding stuff like that.

For them there is the fucking bible.

It does serve a purpose. It gives morons something to read.

[The Grand Nudger]

:coughs: they don't actually read it :coughs:

[Oldandeasilyconfused]

[align=left]

:coughs: they don't actually read it :coughs:

There's a REALLy simple reason for that, but know know me, Mr tact-to-the toenails, I couldn't possibly say.

[Drich]

When I followed up and ask what kind of proof they were looking for? no one knew for sure.

Liar.

I didn't give you specific

If you did not or could not provide what I ask no matter what the reason then explain to me how i lied.

Way to trim that quote to the point where it's completely devoid of context, fuckhead.

It was Rhythm, if I recall correctly, who mentioned specifically what one would expect to find in DNA evidence if your "hypothesis" is correct. Yet, you claim "no one was sure" what evidence they were looking for. Liar.

I told you I wanted to hear your demonstrable evidence. That's specific enough for anyone else around here who is making material claims. I made a point to keep an open mind, and was willing to examine whatever demonstrable evidence you could produce.

But it seems that all you want to do is play childish fucking games and blame those who you would try to convince that your failure to produce evidence is somehow thier fault.

It doesn't work that way, shit-for-brains.

GDIAF.

Ok lets test my hypothesis:
I have a several biblically based evidences that supports this theory would this satisfy your need for evidence??

If not please explain what would.

If you do not know what you are looking for (and only know what you are not) then how will you know when you find it?
Until you can give me some direction to take know you have ended your own search for "evidence." This model of providing "proof" to those who ask seek and knock for it was established by God. So if you can put to words what you are looking for of Him, then maybe you can find Him as well. Or at least with some help be able to narrow your search. I am offering assistance with both, but know it will involve some effort on your part.

[NoMoreFaith]

Ok lets test my hypothesis:
I have a several biblically based evidences that supports this theory would this satisfy your need for evidence??

Why on earth would you think the bible constitutes evidence? Most of its claims, if not unverified, are demonstrably false (flood, exodus, plagues, etc etc)

It is a logical fallacy to use the bible as evidence that the events of the bible took place. Its circular.
As evidence, its no more valid than the Iliad proving the existence of Zeus.

Its taken 32 pages to get to "My evidence is circular logic". I am disappoint. I had hoped better from someone as articulate.

[Chuff]

biblically based evidences

thats an oxymoron and is of absolutely no consequence here, how about some scientifically based evidences? Something that can be tested, quantified, proven outside of the bible by people who don't accept it as the infallible word.