I think I've explained in my book, "Every berk is addicted to conflict", that every person has some kind of a disposition to conflicts.
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?
Poll: Are Atheists addicted to conflict? This poll is closed. |
|||
Yes | 2 | 5.88% | |
No | 25 | 73.53% | |
Perhaps | 7 | 20.59% | |
Total | 34 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Are Atheists addicted to conflict?
|
I think I've explained in my book, "Every berk is addicted to conflict", that every person has some kind of a disposition to conflicts.
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?
OP its not that atheists are into conflict its that this is the interwebs and everybody is a dick, cause theres no real life consequences.
RE: Are Atheists addicted to conflict?
April 17, 2012 at 8:05 pm
(This post was last modified: April 17, 2012 at 8:07 pm by Oldandeasilyconfused.)
(April 17, 2012 at 6:17 pm)parttimeprojectionist Wrote: OP its not that atheists are into conflict its that this is the interwebs and everybody is adick, cause theres no real life consequences. How cynical. Neither statement is true in principle as far as I can tell.. Not everyone is a dick,although most can be. Here there are heaps of people who are not dicks apart from me and Min. (we are cunts) As a group, I think our moderators are very un-dick-like, although some have their moments.. As for consequences: My observation is that a LOT of people on forums "have issues"and fragile egos. This seems to include some of the more aggressive and obnoxious personalities. (although not all of us ) Some seem unable to cope with the robust and colourful tit-for-ta of many forums and are genuinely hurt. I don't really care about them. I DO care when an un-dick ,such as Summer,gets hurt.. All human interaction has real consequences.
I avoid conflict unless somebody says something extremely stupid. And it has to be an infuriating sort of stupidity.
This is stupid
(April 17, 2012 at 12:42 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:(April 17, 2012 at 10:25 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: the logical extension of theism is chaos since God can change the rules at any time and the universe only has the appearance of order because God has chosen not to change things up for awhile.That would apply to some forms of theism, but not all. Nihilism applies to all forms of atheism. Lets see: Existential nihilism: Nope, I think our lives have intrinsic value, and are more valuable because they're finite and you won't see the like of any of us again after we're gone. We don't have to matter to the universe, we matter to us. Claiming that we only matter because we matter to God is itself nihilism, it's a statement that necessarily implies we have no intrinsic worth. Moral nihilism: Nope, I'm willing to go out on a limb and take it as axiomatic that what's good for human beings is good and work the rest out from there. It may not be an ultimate grounding, but it's a least as good a grounding as claiming that good is what God says is good. Epistemological nihilism: Nope, I'm a rational skeptic not an extreme skeptic. Metaphysical nihilism: Nope, I accept the reality of reality as axiomatic. Doesn't do much good to think otherwise as far as I can see. And can reality really be real if it's contingent on the will of a supreme being? Political nihislism: Nuh-uh, I think there's such a thing as too much anarchy. And there's only one form of atheism: not believing in a God, god, or gods. There's only one form of theism, too. A religion being theistic doesn't make it a different form of theism. Theism is believing in at least one God or god. A different form of theism would no longer BE theism. (April 17, 2012 at 10:23 am)ChadWooters Wrote:(April 17, 2012 at 6:27 am)Tempus Wrote: There are no atheist values because it isn't a philosophy.There are no atheist values because the logical extension of atheism is nihilism. (how's that for seeking conflict) If atheism causes nihilism how can atheist values (or rather the lack of) be determined by nihilism? That's circular reasoning unless you conflate atheism and nihilism.
Interesting OP. Interesting thread.
I think all you god-forsaken heathens are out to get me! [/sarcasm] Inserting some seriousness though ... Although Mr. Drake certainly should not have posed his question to include all atheists universally, there maybe be some validity to the thought process behind it. This statement in particular: (April 13, 2012 at 2:10 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: Regarding Atheist Forums: as I read the thread, it would seem he does have a wee point. It doesn't take much to get an over reaction here. I just don't think being atheist has anything to do with it. How bout it? I guess every one would have to answer that question for themselves. Am I here because I love to discuss or am I here because I love to throw down? an interesting thread though ... |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Are Atheists Afraid to Join Atheists? | Asmodeus | 10 | 573 |
October 26, 2024 at 9:09 am Last Post: Asmodeus |
|
I enjoy far right atheists more than lgbt marxist atheists | Sopra | 4 | 2408 |
February 28, 2018 at 9:09 pm Last Post: Edwardo Piet |
|
Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! | Whateverist | 123 | 40604 |
May 15, 2017 at 9:05 am Last Post: Whateverist |
|
Why Science and religious faith are in conflict. | Jehanne | 28 | 8419 |
May 1, 2017 at 6:24 pm Last Post: vorlon13 |
|
Science and Religion not in direct conflict? | maestroanth | 26 | 6017 |
December 31, 2015 at 10:35 pm Last Post: Brian37 |
|
A few points of conflict with Jackie L's (Eilonnwy) article. | tavarish | 128 | 39643 |
December 4, 2010 at 8:48 pm Last Post: thesummerqueen |