Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?

[Tobie]

What do we actually have to do to knock some sense into you? Intelligent design is the pipe dream of morons who are still clinging on to the ignorance of bronze-age goat herders.

[Alter2Ego]

"When that happened you threw a fucking hissy fit and put the person who showed you up to be an arse on ignore. Every time someone rebuts you it is in fact YOU who does not present any intelligent argument against, and when you can't answer questions you literally resort to ignorance."

This.

Troll can't handle being spanked.

Since you are now following me around with messages similar to the above, while adding nothing to the subject matter of the thread, you are likewise being added to my Ignore list. You can now continue posting these types of flaming messages to your heart's content as I will no longer be able to see them.

[Napoléon]

Since you are now following me around with messages similar to the above, while adding nothing to the subject matter of the thread, you are likewise being added to my Ignore list. You can now continue posting these types of flaming messages to your heart's content as I will no longer be able to see them.

Pussy. Both intellectually and because you are a giant pink minge.

[Anomalocaris]

This Alter2Ego seems to have a some nasty clinical psychiatric and personality pathologies in addition to the run-of-the-mill intellectual, emotional and cognative issues normall associated with fundamentalists in the scientific age. She reminds me of the sort of low intelligence prude who can't find gainful employment except as teacher at some cut-rate kindergarden, and there, having found herself intellectually outgunned by her charges as well, ducks behind the shield of her position as "teacher", issueing pompous "questions for discussion", highlighting her own assertions in bold face, relying on nothing but her presumption of her own position.

But unlike what might be expected even from normal low-wit baby sitters, this Alter2Egodoesn't quite have even the wits to recognize she is not in kindergarden class any more, and is strutting her feeble pretenses before a circle of real adults.

[LastPoet]

Its the Dunning-Kruger effect, Chuck

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyOHJa5Vj...plpp_video

[Napoléon]

I fucking love Chuck.

[Epimethean]

Nothing like whinging, plugging her ears and giving a great big, "nyah-nyah, I can't hear you" to everyone who has been explaining sense to her. Dumbness distilled.

[downbeatplumb]

As for the assertion that I got my information from some scientific website, I ought to put that to Mr Franks, my senior school Astronomy teacher. Even at the age of 86, I'm sure he'd feel inclined to slap you daft(er) for such an insult. I may verify my information using current scientific knowledge, sure; I happen to care whether what I learn is accurate.

I'll close by reiterating what I said elsewhere: there's nothing random and accidental about the god-damn laws of physics!

ALTER2EGO -to- STIMBO:
Since you concede there is nothing random and accidental about laws of physics, tell me, where did such laws come from? They happened by themselves--meaning no intelligent person guided the outcome? Before you answer that question, below is a reminder of how Laws found in nature is defined by Webster's New World Dictionary.

"a sequence of events that have been observed to occur with UNVARYING UNIFORMITY under the same conditions."

You are doing nothing more than anthropomorphising natural phenomena.

You assume that because something is the way it is then "someone made it that way".

Yet complexity can arise from simplicity.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcuBvj0pw-E

[Jaysyn]

---

As for the assertion that I got my information from some scientific website, I ought to put that to Mr Franks, my senior school Astronomy teacher. Even at the age of 86, I'm sure he'd feel inclined to slap you daft(er) for such an insult. I may verify my information using current scientific knowledge, sure; I happen to care whether what I learn is accurate.

I'll close by reiterating what I said elsewhere: there's nothing random and accidental about the god-damn laws of physics!

ALTER2EGO -to- STIMBO:
Since you concede there is nothing random and accidental about laws of physics, tell me, where did such laws come from? They happened by themselves--meaning no intelligent person guided the outcome? Before you answer that question, below is a reminder of how Laws found in nature is defined by Webster's New World Dictionary.

"a sequence of events that have been observed to occur with UNVARYING UNIFORMITY under the same conditions."

You are doing nothing more than anthropomorphising natural phenomena.

You assume that because something is the way it is then "someone made it that way".

Yet complexity can arise from simplicity.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcuBvj0pw-E

---

[Alter2Ego]

ALTER2EGO -to- STIMBO:
Since you concede there is nothing random and accidental about laws of physics, tell me, where did such laws come from? They happened by themselves--meaning no intelligent person guided the outcome? Before you answer that question, below is a reminder of how Laws found in nature is defined by Webster's New World Dictionary.

"a sequence of events that have been observed to occur with UNVARYING UNIFORMITY under the same conditions."

You are doing nothing more than anthropomorphising natural phenomena.

You assume that because something is the way it is then "someone made it that way".

Yet complexity can arise from simplicity.

ALTER2EGO -to- DOWN BEAT PLUMB:
I'm using logic. Let me ask you a rhetorical question: The computer you're using to write me miles from where you are, did it simply pop up out of nowhere spontaneously? The point being, if the measly computer required an intelligent designer, the far more complex universe that dwarfs the computer--by all logic--must have also required an intelligent designer.