Posts: 1446
Threads: 77
Joined: October 1, 2008
Reputation:
11
RE: Did we really land on the moon in '69?
August 31, 2009 at 6:15 am
Just strikes me that the other 100 or so specimens should be tested for authenticity. Say they are all wood????????
A man is born to a virgin mother, lives, dies, comes alive again and then disappears into the clouds to become his Dad. How likely is that?
Posts: 14932
Threads: 684
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
143
RE: Did we really land on the moon in '69?
August 31, 2009 at 6:57 am
I suspect they have been. Seems like the obvious thing to do. Not all of the rocks would be kept as souvenirs; I reckon most would go for studying.
Posts: 4807
Threads: 291
Joined: October 29, 2008
Reputation:
35
RE: Did we really land on the moon in '69?
September 6, 2009 at 5:14 pm
Of course they will, but there can be no more claim that all evidence comes from one source only, being NASA.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Posts: 1446
Threads: 77
Joined: October 1, 2008
Reputation:
11
RE: Did we really land on the moon in '69?
September 6, 2009 at 5:53 pm
Can we believe the Indian prints? Are they real?
Will the 100 " moonrocks" be tested for authenticity?
It aint over just yet....
A man is born to a virgin mother, lives, dies, comes alive again and then disappears into the clouds to become his Dad. How likely is that?
Posts: 15755
Threads: 194
Joined: May 15, 2009
Reputation:
145
RE: Did we really land on the moon in '69?
September 6, 2009 at 6:01 pm
One can not be certain of any evidence, other than that which is founded on the truth of one equalling one.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day