Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 28, 2024, 7:02 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Psalm 137:9
RE: Psalm 137:9
[quote='Forsaken' pid='241763' dateline='1329689444']
"How blessed will be the one who seizes and dashes your little ones against the rock," (Psalm 137:9).

Below is the take from one of the apologetics.
http://carm.org/bible-difficulties/job-s...g-children

In a nutshell:
1) Just because the bible says so does not mean God approves it. (I thought the bible was the word of God Thinking )
2) You cannot judge God on his morality. Even if he commits atrocities, humans have no right to judge him on that.
-----

Actually - we DO indeed have a right to judge - because the god is claimed to be ALL GOOD and ALL JUST. If the evidence is to the contrary - we can reject those claims.

However- even if you think that this particular statement may not have the approval of a god (NONE actually do in any writings - gods are myth) - one cannot overlook the many actions OF THE GOD in the bible that were unspeakably immoral.

In every population - there are children - from new born infants to very young children who have NOT yet reached the age of reason - and responsibility. They cannot actually "sin" as even established by the religions themselves - what can a 2 month old do - to deserve to be Drowned - or killed in a "passover" - both supposed acts of the god itself - not of any human. In fact - in ancient times - where the life expectancy was below 30 - these children (The catholic church says that age 7 is the age of reason) - represent about 20 percent of the population.

To KILL them in a flood or in the "passover" is simply murder - pure and simple.

THE only good thing is that the stories of the Old Testament are largely false - just fairy tales. Archeology has established that the the Hebrews did not even exist at the claimed time of most of them. No moses - no abraham - the battle of Jericho did not happen - no adam and eve - I could go on. THE hebrews were not in bondage to Egypt either - no Exodus.

So - these stories are all nonsense - but then without the old testament - there is NO basis for the new one.
Reply
RE: Psalm 137:9
Quote:these stories are all nonsense

These stories are one of two things.


1- Scare crows invented by poverty-stricken Judah to stop people from overrunning them ( failed miserably.)

2- A pep rally to get people thinking that they could carve out an empire because their fucking god was with them (also failed miserably.)
Reply
RE: Psalm 137:9
(February 19, 2012 at 7:10 pm)Ace Otana Wrote: It demonstrates just how malevolent and incompetent god is. A god with many faults is not worthy to be called 'god'. Just an irresponsible and evil being abusing his power. Not worthy of worship. Just as a mass murdering dictator isn't worthy of worship.

A God with many faults. According to what standard are you using to judge that God is full of faults. And the verse about bashing infants against rocks doesnt mean what it says. There are websites available that explain it.
Reply
RE: Psalm 137:9
Quote:A God with many faults. According to what standard are you using to judge that God is full of faults.
A rational standard that isn't blinded by a dogmatic need to defend awful BS


Quote:And the verse about bashing infants against rocks doesnt mean what it says.
Yes it does

Quote:There are websites available that explain it.
Yup there are lot's of apologist sites that try to excuse this . Just like there are many Muslim sites that try and excuse the awful shit in the Koran .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
RE: Psalm 137:9
Dude, this thread is five years dead.

Half the people in it haven't posted here in years.

Feel free to create a new thread, but leave the dead in peace.

Plus we have a rule about resurrecting old threads.

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Reply
RE: Psalm 137:9
Oh, and geez, maybe an intro in the intro thread?
"For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan
Reply
RE: Psalm 137:9
(February 19, 2012 at 10:24 pm)chi pan Wrote: What's your point? That you can take a verse out of context and then look at a Christian site at how they rationalize it for what purpose? That we contradict ourselves? Just because David prayed for destruction of babylon does not mean we should all agree with it just as we don't think it's right that David committed adultery. The only point I see is that man sins which is what we've been saying from the start.

And yet big bad daddy god doesn't seem to see fit to come down and correct people's 'misinterpretations' of his so-called inspired, omnibenevolent will. That speaks of a very shitty character of god. You have no way of getting around that one, weasel.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?

---

There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
Reply
RE: Psalm 137:9
(August 29, 2017 at 12:44 am)Astonished Wrote:
(February 19, 2012 at 10:24 pm)chi pan Wrote: What's your point? That you can take a verse out of context and then look at a Christian site at how they rationalize it for what purpose? That we contradict ourselves? Just because David prayed for destruction of babylon does not mean we should all agree with it just as we don't think it's right that David committed adultery. The only point I see is that man sins which is what we've been saying from the start.

And yet big bad daddy god doesn't seem to see fit to come down and correct people's 'misinterpretations' of his so-called inspired, omnibenevolent will. That speaks of a very shitty character of god. You have no way of getting around that one, weasel.

Check the date of what you quoted...
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Reply
RE: Psalm 137:9
(August 28, 2017 at 8:51 pm)Godisgood Wrote:
(February 19, 2012 at 7:10 pm)Ace Otana Wrote: It demonstrates just how malevolent and incompetent god is. A god with many faults is not worthy to be called 'god'. Just an irresponsible and evil being abusing his power. Not worthy of worship. Just as a mass murdering dictator isn't worthy of worship.

A God with many faults. According to what standard are you using to judge that God is full of faults. And the verse about bashing infants against rocks doesnt mean what it says. There are websites available that explain it.

Mainly I use the standard of taking a look at his ersatz followers.  If assholes worship a god the god must be an asshole, too.
Reply
RE: Psalm 137:9
(August 29, 2017 at 12:50 am)KevinM1 Wrote:
(August 29, 2017 at 12:44 am)Astonished Wrote: And yet big bad daddy god doesn't seem to see fit to come down and correct people's 'misinterpretations' of his so-called inspired, omnibenevolent will. That speaks of a very shitty character of god. You have no way of getting around that one, weasel.

Check the date of what you quoted...

I never expect a reply anyway. But I already gave him an insoluble problem that has no answer.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?

---

There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 14 Guest(s)