Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 26, 2024, 4:13 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Proving God Existence
|
Complete nonsense. Junk math.
 (May 8, 2013 at 12:55 am)cato123 Wrote:(May 7, 2013 at 7:57 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: The proof is tricky because it is disproving No god instead of Proving God directly Disproving "no god" is the dumbest statement ever! Double Negative!
Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan
Professional Watcher of The Daily Show and The Colbert Report!  (May 7, 2013 at 7:57 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: This cannot be proven How wonderfully convenient that I can have revelations which will prove everything I say, too!  RE: Proving God Existence
May 8, 2013 at 4:26 am
(This post was last modified: May 8, 2013 at 4:31 am by Muslim Scholar.)
(May 8, 2013 at 2:01 am)Ryantology Wrote:Revelation is a proof(May 7, 2013 at 7:57 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: This cannot be proven if it is proved first to be true from God (May 8, 2013 at 1:43 am)Dragonetti Wrote: Disproving "no god" is the dumbest statement ever! Double Negative!I think it is too advanced to your mutated brain (May 8, 2013 at 12:55 am)cato123 Wrote:I already went almost there(May 7, 2013 at 7:57 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: The proof is tricky because it is disproving No god instead of Proving God directly Because the proven attributes of that God Matches only Islam  (May 8, 2013 at 4:26 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: Revelation is a proof Good luck with that last part! Quote:I already went almost there I think you mean "asserted," not "proven."
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects! (May 8, 2013 at 4:26 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote:(May 8, 2013 at 2:01 am)Ryantology Wrote: How wonderfully convenient that I can have revelations which will prove everything I say, too!Revelation is a proof I think not. That logic is backwards. You must first prove god, not disprove no god, SCIENCE does not work in that fashion. Logic proofs does not out weigh Science, just because you claim it.
Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan
Professional Watcher of The Daily Show and The Colbert Report! 
STILL waiting for proof of this "god-thingy" :S
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
 (May 8, 2013 at 12:33 am)Esquilax Wrote: Crazy thought: how about instead of just claiming you can proof something and then making us wait- presumably while you scrabble for an actual answer to the claim you've made- a few posts before you finally get around to it, why not just proof the damn thing in the same post that you claim to have proof. It would save time and have the added benefit of keeping the insanity concentrated into fewer posts.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould RE: Proving God Existence
May 11, 2013 at 4:21 am
(This post was last modified: May 11, 2013 at 4:24 am by Muslim Scholar.)
(May 8, 2013 at 4:42 am)Dragonetti Wrote: I think not. That logic is backwards. You must first prove god, not disprove no god, SCIENCE does not work in that fashion. Logic proofs does not out weigh Science, just because you claim it.You need to read a bit about logic and proofs! Prove by Contradiction is a well known concept in Algorithms and Logic Logic is the basic understanding method for human Science is built on logic, that is why logic is more sound There are many refuted and false scientific theories On the other-hand logic concepts were never refuted of proved to be false; it is impossible because when we try to do that we need to use logic itself. (May 8, 2013 at 12:49 pm)Tonus Wrote:If I posted everything together it will be a chaos and most of you will not be able to correlate the pieces together(May 8, 2013 at 12:33 am)Esquilax Wrote: Crazy thought: how about instead of just claiming you can proof something and then making us wait- presumably while you scrabble for an actual answer to the claim you've made- a few posts before you finally get around to it, why not just proof the damn thing in the same post that you claim to have proof. (May 8, 2013 at 4:37 am)Esquilax Wrote: I think you mean "asserted," not "proven."Assertion is not based on facts My proof is based on logic (whether you like it or not) The problem is that you need to refute it (logically) to claim it invalid. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
