Usually, you can gauge a person commitement to a discussion when certain care is taken transmitting the message. Simple things like capitalizing, spaces and all that shit. Hell, the speech would remain incoherent in this case, but it would be prettier.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 25, 2024, 9:44 am
Thread Rating:
Blind faith and evolution
|
Quote:From Wikipedia, With my only qualification being that "it takes one to know one", I would say christchinchilla is a flaming example. I'm a recovering one myself so I find those who exhibit what I'm avoiding all the more irritating. I guess I'm about as tolerant as an ex-smoker. Thank gawd for the ignore function.
lol guess what, you don't know.
(July 17, 2013 at 10:24 am)enrico Wrote: Two distant things and yet some people with blind faith say that they believe in evolution. 'Collective progress'. I'm sure the few (relatively) who's work this notion is pinned to are thrilled at being lost in the fog of species-smugness. Still... there's a lot of it about. MM
"The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions" - Leonardo da Vinci
"I think I use the term “radical” rather loosely, just for emphasis. If you describe yourself as “atheist,” some people will say, “Don’t you mean ‘agnostic’?” I have to reply that I really do mean atheist, I really do not believe that there is a god; in fact, I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one ... etc., etc. It’s easier to say that I am a radical atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it’s an opinion I hold seriously." - Douglas Adams (and I echo the sentiment) Chas Wrote:There is no evidence for any gods. Therefore, a lack of belief is a rational conclusion, not dogma. Arrrrrrrrrrrrrhhhhhhhhh A lack of belief? It is rather a lack of desire to look for. You are expecting that someone bring you the evidence in a silver plate. How can it be when God does not have a physical body and when this essence is deep within your consciousness? This type of mentality is much worse then a dogma. (July 21, 2013 at 8:33 am)enrico Wrote:Chas Wrote:There is no evidence for any gods. Therefore, a lack of belief is a rational conclusion, not dogma. I looked; there's no evidence. "essence is deep within your consciousness" ? What?
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method. (July 21, 2013 at 8:33 am)enrico Wrote: Arrrrrrrrrrrrrhhhhhhhhh Alright, I think I can solve this: this god of yours, this collection of deepities that you've forged into a concept of god, does it do things? Affect the physical world in any way, at all? If so, then it can be measured, and evidence can be found. If not, then why should I care? And incidentally, how did you come to be convinced of this god? Something had to do it, right?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects! (July 21, 2013 at 10:59 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Hi! Hi! I'm an agnostic atheist. I have no idea if a god exists or not and realize that no one can prove it. And I'm not ashamed to admit it.
Everything I needed to know about life I learned on Dagobah.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 33 Guest(s)