Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 14, 2024, 9:20 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Blind faith and evolution
RE: Blind faith and evolution
(August 4, 2013 at 7:00 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: Where has my post gone?

You opened with three quotes, then closed only one of them, and then started another quote.

Quote:[ quote='downbeatplumb' pid='488140' dateline='1375614004' ]
[ quote='enrico' pid='488138' dateline='1375610860' ]
[ quote='Katie23' pid='487319' dateline='1375459061' ]
Dude, there is no point or coherence to anything you have said in this article. I would like to a see an example of any atheist who has professed to believe in evolution out of "blind faith". This statement in itself is a direct contradiction, our movement is based on the scientific relationship we have which proves evolution. There is no "faith" needed.
[ /quote ]





[ quote ]
You got it wrong.
Nothing to do...

Add two more close quotes after that one close quote you have in and your post should be visible I think.
Everything I needed to know about life I learned on Dagobah.
Reply
RE: Blind faith and evolution
(August 4, 2013 at 6:07 am)enrico Wrote: The problem with some people is that they lower their consciousness to the level of cockroach so along their calvary they will drop excrements all over the place.
They just can't help themselves.

*pats Enrico on the head*

There, there. Don't be so hard on yourself. Even though you're deluded as fuck, there's no need to call yourself a cockroach.
When I was young, there was a god with infinite power protecting me. Is there anyone else who felt that way? And was sure about it? but the first time I fell in love, I was thrown down - or maybe I broke free - and I bade farewell to God and became human. Now I don't have God's protection, and I walk on the ground without wings, but I don't regret this hardship. I want to live as a person. -Arina Tanemura

Reply
RE: Blind faith and evolution
Chas Wrote:What do you mean "someone born as a worm"?


There got to be some consciousness in the worm otherwise how could he move and follow his ways around.
Without consciousness you are a robot but a worm is not a robot so this consciousness show that he is someone.

Quote:Please read a science book. Please.


Does a science book say that a worm is a robot?ROFLOL
Reply
RE: Blind faith and evolution
(August 5, 2013 at 9:07 am)enrico Wrote: There got to be some consciousness in the worm otherwise how could he move and follow his ways around.

By this ill-informed logic, there must be a consciousness in certain plants too.

rico Wrote:
Quote:Please read a science book. Please.

Does a science book say that a worm is a robot?

Hilarious

I suppose you'll never know until you read one.
[Image: 10314461_875206779161622_3907189760171701548_n.jpg]
Reply
RE: Blind faith and evolution
(August 4, 2013 at 12:01 pm)Kayenneh Wrote:
(August 4, 2013 at 6:07 am)enrico Wrote: The problem with some people is that they lower their consciousness to the level of cockroach so along their calvary they will drop excrements all over the place.
They just can't help themselves.

*pats Enrico on the head*

There, there. Don't be so hard on yourself. Even though you're deluded as fuck, there's no need to call yourself a cockroach.

Can't you be a bit original instead of repeating other people words?
C'on put a bit of effort so i will give you some kudos.Smile
Reply
RE: Blind faith and evolution
(August 5, 2013 at 9:07 am)enrico Wrote:
Chas Wrote:What do you mean "someone born as a worm"?


There got to be some consciousness in the worm otherwise how could he move and follow his ways around.
Without consciousness you are a robot but a worm is not a robot so this consciousness show that he is someone.

Define 'consciousness'. A worm has a nervous system and responds to environmental stimuli.
Quote:
Quote:Please read a science book. Please.


Does a science book say that a worm is a robot?ROFLOL

Define 'robot'. But, yes, a worm is effectively a robot.

Your post implied that some sort of being chose to be born one way or another.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
RE: Blind faith and evolution
(August 5, 2013 at 9:07 am)enrico Wrote: There got to be some consciousness in the worm otherwise how could he move and follow his ways around.

BadWriterSparty Wrote:By this ill-informed logic, there must be a consciousness in certain plants too.

Sure there is otherwise the climbers wouldn't bother to move around looking for better condition to prosper.

enrico Wrote:Does a science book say that a worm is a robot?

BadWriterSparty Wrote:I suppose you'll never know until you read one.


You show me that the science say that worms are robot and i will make you pope.Smile

Chas Wrote:Define 'consciousness'. A worm has a nervous system and responds to environmental stimuli.


Sorry but a nervous system is not enough to make a worm decide what to eat or where to go in his search for the right place to live.
Decision making is the key to physical survival and this decision is not driven by a nervous system.
Behind a nervous system there is always a consciousness otherwise the creature wouldn't have any feelings.
I already show a link in which once you are able to disconnect the consciousness from the body you do not feel any pain.
As far as the worm does not like to be crushed and mashed then it means that consciousness is there.

http://jamie-monk.blogspot.com.au/2011/0...urite.html


Quote:Define 'robot'. But, yes, a worm is effectively a robot.

No, is not as explain above.

Quote:Your post implied that some sort of being chose to be born one way or another.


No, i never said that.
Nobody choose to go through the trouble of creation and evolution.
Everybody consciousness would like to be home where they belong.Angel
Reply
RE: Blind faith and evolution
(August 5, 2013 at 9:51 am)enrico Wrote: Sure there is otherwise the climbers wouldn't bother to move around looking for better condition to prosper.

[Image: 876.jpg]
Reply
RE: Blind faith and evolution
Oh dear. This went to the bad place.
Reply
RE: Blind faith and evolution
(August 5, 2013 at 9:51 am)enrico Wrote:
(August 5, 2013 at 9:07 am)enrico Wrote: There got to be some consciousness in the worm otherwise how could he move and follow his ways around.

BadWriterSparty Wrote:By this ill-informed logic, there must be a consciousness in certain plants too.

Sure there is otherwise the climbers wouldn't bother to move around looking for better condition to prosper.

enrico Wrote:Does a science book say that a worm is a robot?

BadWriterSparty Wrote:I suppose you'll never know until you read one.


You show me that the science say that worms are robot and i will make you pope.Smile

Chas Wrote:Define 'consciousness'. A worm has a nervous system and responds to environmental stimuli.


Sorry but a nervous system is not enough to make a worm decide what to eat or where to go in his search for the right place to live.
Decision making is the key to physical survival and this decision is not driven by a nervous system.
Behind a nervous system there is always a consciousness otherwise the creature wouldn't have any feelings.
I already show a link in which once you are able to disconnect the consciousness from the body you do not feel any pain.
As far as the worm does not like to be crushed and mashed then it means that consciousness is there.

http://jamie-monk.blogspot.com.au/2011/0...urite.html


Quote:Define 'robot'. But, yes, a worm is effectively a robot.

No, is not as explain above.

Quote:Your post implied that some sort of being chose to be born one way or another.


No, i never said that.
Nobody choose to go through the trouble of creation and evolution.
Everybody consciousness would like to be home where they belong.Angel

Your definition of consciousness does not correspond with reality.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Plato's Epistemology: Is Faith a Valid Way to Know? vulcanlogician 10 1778 July 2, 2018 at 2:59 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  Symbolic Death and My Second Crisis of Faith InquiringMind 13 3180 September 21, 2016 at 9:43 pm
Last Post: InquiringMind
  Faith and achievement bennyboy 76 9904 August 17, 2016 at 12:02 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Faith in Science? Mudhammam 15 3691 October 30, 2014 at 3:11 pm
Last Post: TreeSapNest
  Our society values blind optimism. MusicLovingAtheist 27 6362 October 22, 2014 at 10:38 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Is Evolution a science or a faith? Harris 295 74520 August 18, 2014 at 2:21 am
Last Post: Esquilax
  My Loss of faith has caused severe depression Aran 31 7821 June 21, 2013 at 2:41 am
Last Post: whatever76
  The difference between ethical atheism and nihlism is that ethical atheists have more faith jstrodel 104 40515 March 15, 2013 at 8:37 am
Last Post: The Reality Salesman01
  Please stop equating 'belief' and 'faith' Ryft 3 2073 January 4, 2011 at 10:36 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Faith in Humanity Violet 21 16565 March 17, 2010 at 5:00 pm
Last Post: Violet



Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)