(August 21, 2013 at 1:30 am)Godschild Wrote: You bet I do, why, because it is one of your strategies in debating Christians, do you think we are to dumb to see through your childish ways. I will not put their names on this or any open forum, that would be unethical and you know it, disclaim what I say if you desire it want change the truth. This is my answer to one and all.
GC
If you are going to make a claim about science, in the context of a discussion on a scientific issue, then you need to cite your reasoning, and if you are not a scientist yourself, then you need to cite some actual authorities to verify your claim. Preferably, you'll even have some published works of theirs that show this; that's what we want to see. We're not asking you to divulge the names of private individuals, but to lead us to the already published and publicly accessible written works that they have provided. The fact that you haven't is pretty telling.
If you don't cite resources, then I could just do this, and have exactly the same standing as you: the top billion scientists in the world, all of them much smarter than the ones you're citing GC, all agree that radiometric dating is perfect in every way, and beyond dispute.
There. I guess that's true now, right? I don't need to prove it, that would be unethical!
Just admit that you were lying, dude...
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!