RE: Blind faith and evolution
September 3, 2013 at 8:00 am
(This post was last modified: September 3, 2013 at 8:42 am by Little Rik.)
(September 2, 2013 at 5:45 am)trekky0623 Wrote: You don't get it. There is no other science besides “physical” science because science requires observation. If you cannot observe something, it cannot be scientifically examined or studied. So again, what other kinds of science is there?
And looking for something other than the “physical” won't work. By definition, anything beyond the natural universe is supernatural. If it is not part of the “physical,” natural universe, it cannot be observed by us, and it is not science. Period.
Sorry but you are talking a lot of CACCARONI (garbage).
Science is the effort to build knowledge.
Whether this knowledge is physical or mental or spiritual is totally irrelevant.
Unfortunately so many people that never studied latin pretend to know the real meaning of words coming from latin.
I did asked my doctor the meaning of the word CANCER.
He would not know.
I said to him that cancer mean crab but again he would not know why the latin call this disease crab.
He knows how the disease works but total ignorance about the real meaning.
You just remind me my doctor.
Anyway coming back to science who said that the evidence has got to be tested PHYSICALLY and if can not be tested PHYSICALLY is not science?
You got blind faith in the version of something that is stated by someone interested in the physical aspect alone and this create a dogma that you procrastinate in your life.
(September 2, 2013 at 11:26 am)BadWriterSparty Wrote: This just keeps getting better. The more we refute what Enrico says, the more unintelligible he becomes. I wonder if our words are somehow devolving his mind?
Unintelligible?
I only asked you what is the real meaning of the word PHILOSOPHY and so far NONE has been able to explain the real meaning.
Excuse me but considering that you guys post in this thread you suppose to know the meaning so who is the UNINTELLIGIBLE?
(September 2, 2013 at 6:07 pm)apophenia Wrote: We neither desired you nor sought you, and yet here you are, claiming to have brought us something of value.
Claiming?
I did not know that.
As far as i know i came here to have a bit of fun by confronting my philosophy with materialistic dogmas.
Quote:(And for what it's worth, I've been "found" by many men that I wasn't looking for. I've been celibate for close to 20 years, and they keep "finding me.")
You know what happen when you dig for gold?
Before you find the real nugget you got to find a lot of dust so while you wait for that great day you got to put up with dust.
(September 2, 2013 at 2:35 pm)LostLocke Wrote: But what I don't get is what any of this has to do with your first statement about a "straight line".
Downbeatplumb was telling that evolution is not linear (follow a straight line) while i was telling that it is.
That's all.
The dinosaurs may have disappeared for glaciation or other reasons but that does not mean that the linear evolution is interrupted.
Their consciousness will carry on in some other form of life so the linear evolution continue unabated.
Capishh!!!