My misogyny

[Kereli]

Maybe that should be the caption to your avatar.

That is the best with which you could concoct?

*yawns*

Nope. I'll save my best material for someone who's worth it. By the way how about you learn english. "the best with which you could concoct" is incorrect.

[Captain Colostomy]

For Pete's sake. Kereli, you joined up here expecting...what?

Cannot expect intelligence from the dumb.

I think this is her thought, too, which brings me back to her motives. Why initiate this thread? Why not vent on a brick wall? We're not her therapists...we can offer opinions in good faith only. Not liking those opinions is one thing, but getting pissy and lashing out about it? This makes for an exercise in futility.

[Foxaèr]

Nope. I'll save my best material for someone who's worth it.

If what is below any indication of your best material, you fail.

By the way how about you learn english. "the best with which you could concoct" is incorrect.

[Kereli]

Sorry Maelstrom, I don't speak pidgin english. You'll have to get someone to help you with your posts.

[Captain Colostomy]

The way she's throwing punches at you, Maelstrom, I think she has Jesus issues too. :p

[Foxaèr]

The way she's throwing punches at you, Maelstrom, I think she has Jesus issues too. :p

Her issues are too many to count.

[Kereli]

The way she's throwing punches at you, Maelstrom, I think she has Jesus issues too. :p

Her issues are too many to count.

Name 20.

[Foxaèr]

Name 20.

You just did.

[Faith No More]

The problem is the nature of my generalizations. They simply don't want to hear NEGATIVE generalizations about WOMEN. And that right there is the real issue. That's why they're arguing with me, not because I'm wrong, but because it makes them extremely uncomfortable to hear negative generalizations about women. That's all it is. Even the fact that I myself am a woman doesn't change anything, in fact it makes them even more uncomfortable.

No, the problem is not the nature of your generalizations. In fact, I think you're just using that as an excuse to ignore what people are saying.

Regardless of the validity of your generalizations(I deny that they are valid), or their nature, you are using them as an excuse to dislike an entire group of people, rather than judge a person on an individual basis. This is bigotry, plain and simple.

Then you proceed to make irrational generalizations about men that just clearly do not match up with reality. Obviously, something has tainted the filter with which you process information.

I feel, however, you will just dismiss this all as disdain for your generalizations in order to cling to your idiocy.

[Kereli]

The problem is the nature of my generalizations. They simply don't want to hear NEGATIVE generalizations about WOMEN. And that right there is the real issue. That's why they're arguing with me, not because I'm wrong, but because it makes them extremely uncomfortable to hear negative generalizations about women. That's all it is. Even the fact that I myself am a woman doesn't change anything, in fact it makes them even more uncomfortable.

No, the problem is not the nature of your generalizations. In fact, I think you're just using that as an excuse to ignore what people are saying.

Regardless of the validity of your generalizations(I deny that they are valid), or their nature, you are using them as an excuse to dislike an entire group of people, rather than judge a person on an individual basis. This is bigotry, plain and simple.

Then you proceed to make irrational generalizations about men that just clearly do not match up with reality. Obviously, something has tainted the filter with which you process information.

I feel, however, you will just dismiss this all as disdain for your generalizations in order to cling to your idiocy.

Why am I making excuses?