[split] PORN

[Violet]

Na! too light, plus they don't respond - that's not the way, I was thinking more along the lines of slaves from poor countries (mature ones); Like I said, I'd look after her

As i told you already 20$ and you've got access to "slaves"... although you might have to actually visit a 'poor country' to really buy one...

And even then, Australia wouldn't recognize the slavery in law

[Zen Badger]

As long as it works for you it's all good.

As for me, I'm a lesbian trapped in a mans body.

Interesting... then you would be transexual?

I'm sorry... but if you aren't a woman: you by definition can't be a lesbian

more like trisexual.

---

Na! too light, plus they don't respond - that's not the way, I was thinking more along the lines of slaves from poor countries (mature ones); Like I said, I'd look after her

As i told you already 20$ and you've got access to "slaves"... although you might have to actually visit a 'poor country' to really buy one...

And even then, Australia wouldn't recognize the slavery in law

They would,

They are called mail order brides.

[Violet]

more like trisexual.

Perhaps...? But if you state that you are lesbian, then you must by the definition of lesbian be a woman Bisexuality, androphilia, genophilia, trisexuality, etc. do not suggest the sex/gender of the person, but are rather more concerned with that which they are attracted to, than any similarities they share (or fail to share) with their attractions.

They would,

They are called mail order brides.

Wouldn't that be marriage?

Trustworthy is referring to an actual owned person (see slave, in this case particularly a slave for the purpose of sexual enjoyment on the part of the owner), which is not necessarily the same as marriage (although marriage in some places is essentially slavery, if considering only that one 'partner' is the legal property of the other)... and there is no legal position for such a case in australia, see: http://www.milism.net/contract.htm or a number of other resources. This is not to suggest that there are not countries where a person can become a slave... but unless recognized by a national body (as most would not appear to, considering that many think that slavery has been abolished): the slave would be immediately freed whilst under the jurisdiction of the 'free' state.

So whilst a person might "own" another... they cannot do so legally so far as I personally know of... though that is not to suggest that he could not travel (or order from) a country where such slaves are legal (and who's slaves australia recognizes).

[TruthWorthy]

yeah, only my slave has to be a nympho; preferably not an aussie, might be nice to find one with brains lol

[Pippy]

Hey again,

I didn't know you were TG SAE! I am quite familiar with that world, but it's best not gotten into. If you care about little ol' my opinion, I always took you for female.

Who the fuck cares? If you don't like porn, don't watch it. Nobody is making you.

Oh..... Kay. Who the fuck cares about your fucking opinion (about fucking)? I don't like porn, and thank you for your permission, I don't watch it. Nobody is making me, except for the CK and Abercrombie ads...

If you don't like my opinion on porn, who the fuck cares? Don't listen to my opinion, no on is making you.

Porn makes masturbation more fun. Masturbation is proven to be good for you. Therefore, porn=good
Anyone who pretends they don't masturbate is a terrible liar.

That is about as fallacious as possible. A+B=C, and if C is good, A must also be good. Very in depth.
Keep telling yourself that everyone masturbates, hopefully it makes you feel better.

Fuck, this is starting to get old fast. I am not here to be a whipping post for you'se. I have a different opinion on porn than everyone else here, congratu-fucking-lations. Do I have to post links to prove porn is bad for us, and then be called into question, or can I just not and skip a step?

I am happy I can entertain everyone. Thanks.

[TruthWorthy]

porn porn porn porn

[Edwardo Piet]

Pippy is so fucking funny. Don't worry Pip, I'm happy to be entertained by you indeed

EvF

[Eilonnwy]

That is about as fallacious as possible. A+B=C, and if C is good, A must also be good. Very in depth.

Yes, yes. In depth is an excellent way of putting it.

Keep telling yourself that everyone masturbates, hopefully it makes you feel better.

It is part of natural human development to touch yourself, especially as a child when you're discovering your body and what feels good. Those of us without religious or social hangups can admit to it and continue the fun.

Fuck, this is starting to get old fast. I am not here to be a whipping post for you'se. I have a different opinion on porn than everyone else here, congratu-fucking-lations. Do I have to post links to prove porn is bad for us, and then be called into question, or can I just not and skip a step?

I am happy I can entertain everyone. Thanks.

No, Pippy, you can't keep trying every method possible to squirm out of backing up your statements.

[Edwardo Piet]

Well, he can try.

EvF

[Tiberius]

I didn't know you were TG SAE! I am quite familiar with that world, but it's best not gotten into. If you care about little ol' my opinion, I always took you for female.

Why is it best not getting into? Have you got some kind of notion that being transgender is "bad" for you as well?

Oh..... Kay. Who the fuck cares about your fucking opinion (about fucking)? I don't like porn, and thank you for your permission, I don't watch it. Nobody is making me, except for the CK and Abercrombie ads...

If you don't like my opinion on porn, who the fuck cares? Don't listen to my opinion, no on is making you.

Actually, it wasn't an opinion about fucking, it was an opinion about watching people fucking. What I think pisses people off Pippy, is that you come into these threads and act like you have a PhD is whateverthefuckwearetalkingaboutology from the university of Ijustmadeallmyfactsup (I think it's in Russia).

You say you "feel deeply obliged" to inform us that pornography, of which I suspect you know little about as it is (you certainly don't know anything about video games or tv...or 9/11 for that matter), is bad for us. You do this with a tone that comes across as condescending at best.

You claim afterwards that it is "all opinion" but it never comes across that way, and hence seems to the rest of us like you are taking a position of "higher authority", which is generally why we question you (also because your facts make little to no sense).

If you present your opinion as fact, people will call you on it. As an example, let me convert your previous statements about porn from factual assertion to mere opinion:

I know it is old hat now, but in my honest opinion, I think porn is bad for you, and that we should come to terms with what it does to our sexuality and relationships with each other. Isn't this really getting old? Seriously though, I don't think there are few things worse than porn. In my view it's worse than TV and video games put together! It comes across as objectification, desensitization, dominance, and some of the grossness already gone over previously in this thread.

I think we should have quiet, polite sex when no one is looking, and then not discuss it afterward...

See? Doesn't that both read better and sound better? You don't assert random opinions as if they are true, you just present them in a opinionated form (which of course, as opinions, they should be). This paragraph is one where someone can respond "Pippy, I respectfully disagree with your opinion" instead of responding "Pippy, you abuse facts and act like a know-it-all prick."

If you want to discuss opinions and not provide evidence, I don't think many will mind. It's when you assert facts of nature as if they were created to agree with the "will of Pippy" that we challenge them.

Do I have to post links to prove porn is bad for us, and then be called into question, or can I just not and skip a step?

If you want to retract your earlier statements as opinion, then no. If you want to "prove" porn is bad for you, as you seem to indicate here, then yes, we require evidence. I'm afraid not all of us subscribe to the "will of Pippy" as our belief system.