Posts: 103
Threads: 5
Joined: December 3, 2013
Reputation:
0
RE: If there is no God, then, one may ask
December 10, 2013 at 1:08 pm
(This post was last modified: December 10, 2013 at 1:17 pm by DOS.)
A simple question can put the atheists to stupor.
Who here voted for a man thinking he's governing something?
Posts: 6990
Threads: 89
Joined: January 6, 2012
Reputation:
103
RE: If there is no God, then, one may ask
December 10, 2013 at 1:25 pm
(December 10, 2013 at 1:08 pm)DOS Wrote: A simple question can put the atheists to stupor.
Who here voted for a man thinking he's governing something?
I voted for C, a spoon. So not me
Posts: 13051
Threads: 66
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation:
92
RE: If there is no God, then, one may ask
December 10, 2013 at 1:41 pm
(December 10, 2013 at 1:08 pm)DOS Wrote: A simple question can put the atheists to stupor.
A simple mind sees stupor instead of evasive mockery.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Posts: 7174
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: If there is no God, then, one may ask
December 10, 2013 at 2:11 pm
(December 10, 2013 at 2:38 am)max-greece Wrote: Where is the no-one or nothing option?
Hahaha, you were expecting an honest poll!
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 103
Threads: 5
Joined: December 3, 2013
Reputation:
0
RE: If there is no God, then, one may ask
December 10, 2013 at 2:36 pm
Would be very interesting to hear the arguments of those who think it's a man who governs the whole order of things on earth and not God.
Posts: 7174
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: If there is no God, then, one may ask
December 10, 2013 at 2:50 pm
It's this guy:
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 2082
Threads: 72
Joined: March 12, 2013
Reputation:
44
RE: If there is no God, then, one may ask
December 10, 2013 at 2:51 pm
(This post was last modified: December 10, 2013 at 3:01 pm by The Reality Salesman01.)
(December 10, 2013 at 2:36 pm)DOS Wrote: Would be very interesting to hear the arguments of those who think it's a man who governs the whole order of things on earth and not God.
That all depends on what you mean. Arguments can be made about Man holding the keys to many things on earth, and I'm sure something could be said about our potential to bring earth as we know it to a hault. But as far as the governing laws we use to describe the usual order of things from our human perspective on earth, they are not things that are regularly manipulated. If they were, it wouldn't be very helpful to assume them as norms, would it? Now, God? I'm not sure what that adds to the question.
We can either try to understand more about the earth so that we may have a more positive influence on what we can control, or we can insert God and profess it all to be unknowable and out of our control. The latter suggestion is intellectually bankrupt. The most honest approach to answering this rather silly question would be-
There are things we do not understand, and others we do. Through our knowledge, we as men, can choose to control or ignore the matters within our scope of influence.
Posts: 3638
Threads: 20
Joined: July 20, 2011
Reputation:
47
RE: If there is no God, then, one may ask
December 10, 2013 at 2:52 pm
(December 10, 2013 at 2:22 am)DOS Wrote: Here is a question that is troubling me: if there is no God, then, one may ask, who governs human life and, in general, the whole order of things on earth?
I'll bet you are unable to see why this is a malformed, and fallacious question, huh?
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Posts: 2082
Threads: 72
Joined: March 12, 2013
Reputation:
44
RE: If there is no God, then, one may ask
December 10, 2013 at 2:58 pm
(December 10, 2013 at 1:08 pm)DOS Wrote: A simple question can put the atheists to stupor.
Who here voted for a man thinking he's governing something? Your loaded question assumes that an agent is governing anything at all. It would behoove you to compare and contrast-Prescriptive Vs. Descriptive with regards to the "laws" of the universe in relation to our human perception that gives them meaning. Absent a mind capable of reflection, the universe is absent of cognitive boundaries. Did this not occur to you as an obvious error in your attempt to stuff the universe in the front seat of a RC car?
Posts: 103
Threads: 5
Joined: December 3, 2013
Reputation:
0
RE: If there is no God, then, one may ask
December 10, 2013 at 3:01 pm
(December 10, 2013 at 2:51 pm)The Reality Salesman Wrote: (December 10, 2013 at 2:36 pm)DOS Wrote: Would be very interesting to hear the arguments of those who think it's a man who governs the whole order of things on earth and not God.
That all depends on what you mean. Arguments can be made about Man holding the keys to many things on earth, and I'm sure something could be said about our potential to bring earth as we know it to a hault. But as fat as the governing laws we use to describe the usual order of things from our human perspective on earth are not things that are regularly manipulated. God? I'm not sure what that adds to the question.
We can either try to understand more about the earth so that we may have a more positive influence on what we can control, or we can insert God and profess it all to be unknowable and out of our control. The latter suggestion is intellectually bankrupt. The most honest approach to answering this rather silly question would be-
There are things we do not understand, and others we do. Through our knowledge, we as men, can choose to control or ignore the matters within our scope of influence.
The question is not what man can or cannot. The question is - who governs human life and, in general, the whole order of things on earth?
Your vote?
|