Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 24, 2024, 9:01 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Completely skipped this section.
#51
RE: Completely skipped this section.
(February 21, 2014 at 11:51 am)Quantum Theorist Wrote: I claimed that you claimed what?

That I claim that God exists!

I never have and never can.
#52
RE: Completely skipped this section.
(February 21, 2014 at 11:59 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Has it occurred to you that if you don't claim God exists, he wasn't talking about you in the first place?

Hullo, Mister.
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
#53
RE: Completely skipped this section.
(February 21, 2014 at 12:04 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote:
(February 21, 2014 at 11:59 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Has it occurred to you that if you don't claim God exists, he wasn't talking about you in the first place?

Hullo, Mister.

Milady. (bows)
#54
RE: Completely skipped this section.
(February 19, 2014 at 4:10 pm)Quantum Theorist Wrote: no religion has met their burden of proof

Did we miss this?
#55
RE: Completely skipped this section.
(February 21, 2014 at 12:11 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:
(February 19, 2014 at 4:10 pm)Quantum Theorist Wrote: no religion has met their burden of proof

Did we miss this?

Are you claiming to be a religion?

But whatever you need to tell yourself to maintain the OP was about you.
#56
RE: Completely skipped this section.
If you read through the thread mister you'll see where it gets narrowed down to me.

But whatever excuse you need to hold onto your pride is fine by me Angel Tongue


I'm a fully paid up member of the Christian religion. My Christian life has been far from isolated, so I feel confident in representing it.
#57
RE: Completely skipped this section.
(February 20, 2014 at 9:44 am)Quantum Theorist Wrote:
(February 20, 2014 at 1:02 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Yet still you can't tell me what the claim is?

You can't accuse me of circular reasoning until I produce a reason that is circular. If you're going to make my argument for me then that's a sure way to win Wink

Excuse me, but you said the theologies burden of proof has been met, when it clearly hasn't. That is circular reasoning and begging the question.

Your claim is that a god exists, is it not? let's not be dishonest. That's why you tried to shirk the burden of proof onto me.

This can't possibly be civil if you're going to pretend you aren't advocating for your Christian sky daddy.

You claim I have the burden of proof. To prove what exactly? thus my pixie example.

I gave my opinion that religions haven't met the standards of evidence to meet the burden of proof.

How exactly is that not acceptable unless you don't understand the burden of proof...

I think fr0d0 is what I would call an 'agnostic Christian'. His claim is not that the Christian God exists, only that he believes it does, and admits to not knowing. All it takes to make that position legitimate is holding it sincerely.

(February 21, 2014 at 12:21 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: If you read through the thread mister you'll see where it gets narrowed down to me.

But whatever excuse you need to hold onto your pride is fine by me Angel Tongue


I'm a fully paid up member of the Christian religion. My Christian life has been far from isolated, so I feel confident in representing it.

You mean after a series of interchanges, it became about you? Yeah, I noticed that. If this wasn't an intro thread, I wouldn't have a problem with it.

(February 21, 2014 at 3:39 am)fr0d0 Wrote:
(February 21, 2014 at 12:11 am)thesummerqueen Wrote: Mind your manners.

If you look you'll see I was called a creotard first. I'm not saying that makes me right, but it does display a certain blinkered vision.

I just re-read all of Q's posts in this thread up to this point looking for the one where he or she called you a 'creotard'. I couldn't find it, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen. If you'll give me the post number, I'll be happy to chide Q mildly for the breach of etiquette.
#58
RE: Completely skipped this section.
You're giving the op an opportunity to dodge the question. Let's keep to that.

I requested the thread split after r suggested it. As far as I'm concerned the discussion just grew. I got the impression the the op wasn't new here, from the thread title, which is why I was more willing to engage.
#59
RE: Completely skipped this section.
(February 21, 2014 at 12:39 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You're giving the op an opportunity to dodge the question. Let's keep to that.

I requested the thread split after r suggested it. As far as I'm concerned the discussion just grew. I got the impression the the op wasn't new here, from the thread title, which is why I was more willing to engage.

I'm glad you requested the split, hopefully that will happen. I realize he/she isn't completely new, but it's still an intro thread. I know how easy it is for things to escalate, and it takes two to tango and all that. This is the only situation where I give the OP more slack because they're the OP.
#60
RE: Completely skipped this section.
(February 21, 2014 at 12:39 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You're giving the op an opportunity to dodge the question. Let's keep to that.

I requested the thread split after r suggested it. As far as I'm concerned the discussion just grew. I got the impression the the op wasn't new here, from the thread title, which is why I was more willing to engage.

Who's "presumptuous" now?

I didn't dodge anything, your whole argument in this introduction thread is asinine. If you shift the burden of proof onto me in your first reply, then you are obviously a religious person. Do you have to say it directly? You did acknowledge later than you were Christian. It was in your custom title that you were Christian, until you changed it. And why would you claim it's my burden of proof? If you knew where the burden of proof rests you wouldn't show your "ignorance" on the topic.

This was done yesterday. It's just getting tiresome with you. Don't bother splitting this thread, there's nothing more to talk about with you.
If the hypothetical idea of an afterlife means more to you than the objectively true reality we all share, then you deserve no respect.



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Le new, completely original introductory topic.. le_procyon 6 2348 April 7, 2012 at 5:51 pm
Last Post: fuckass365



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)