Science was once a child of the church.

[Esquilax]

Neither, its a result of research, history, education, science, common sense, logic, and academics. From all the combined information I have, god is real. I both can explain it, and not explain it.

So, you still don't understand the difference between evidence and assertions, plus a heaping helping of the Dunning-Kruger effect?

, I had a thread, " Is god real", and I went at it for 4 years explaining how god is real. 4 long years I explained it from every angle I could think of; and in all that time, I have never seen a single shred of evidence that he does not exist.

Oh look, you also don't understand the burden of proof. How surprising.

I saw that your first "evidence" in that thread was the assertion that "creatures reproduce after their own kind," which is horrible for all kinds of reasons. I don't exactly hold out hope for the rest of that little crusade.

[mickiel]

Neither, its a result of research, history, education, science, common sense, logic, and academics. From all the combined information I have, god is real. I both can explain it, and not explain it.

So, you still don't understand the difference between evidence and assertions, plus a heaping helping of the Dunning-Kruger effect?

, I had a thread, " Is god real", and I went at it for 4 years explaining how god is real. 4 long years I explained it from every angle I could think of; and in all that time, I have never seen a single shred of evidence that he does not exist.

Oh look, you also don't understand the burden of proof. How surprising.

I saw that your first "evidence" in that thread was the assertion that "creatures reproduce after their own kind," which is horrible for all kinds of reasons. I don't exactly hold out hope for the rest of that little crusade.

I am curious, how did you use that quote tag? I don't understand how to use it.

---

Neither, its a result of research, history, education, science, common sense, logic, and academics. From all the combined information I have, god is real. I both can explain it, and not explain it.

So, you still don't understand the difference between evidence and assertions, plus a heaping helping of the Dunning-Kruger effect?

, I had a thread, " Is god real", and I went at it for 4 years explaining how god is real. 4 long years I explained it from every angle I could think of; and in all that time, I have never seen a single shred of evidence that he does not exist.

Oh look, you also don't understand the burden of proof. How surprising.

I saw that your first "evidence" in that thread was the assertion that "creatures reproduce after their own kind," which is horrible for all kinds of reasons. I don't exactly hold out hope for the rest of that little crusade.

Lets see if I got this quote tag thing right.

[Rampant.A.I.]

[mickiel]

I am pleased with the views and responses this thread is getting; and its getting you're attention as well.

[Rampant.A.I.]

I am pleased with the views and responses this thread is getting; and its getting you're attention as well.

Because it's hilarious to see such misguided claims as "science is a child of the Catholic Church."

[mickiel]

I am pleased with the views and responses this thread is getting; and its getting you're attention as well.

Because it's hilarious to see such misguided claims as "science is a child of the Catholic Church."

History records that science once was a child of the church.

I am curious, are you going to threaten me in this thread as well?

[Rampant.A.I.]

---

Because it's hilarious to see such misguided claims as "science is a child of the Catholic Church."

History records that science once was a child of the church.

I am curious, are you going to threaten me in this thread as well?

Are you going to continue lying and misrepresenting what other posters are saying, and playing victim in both threads?

[Esquilax]

I am curious, how did you use that quote tag? I don't understand how to use it.

Just hit the reply button at the bottom of whatever post it is you want to quote, and it'll show up in your text box with a complete set of quote tags, no need to monkey around with them.

[Rampant.A.I.]

[mickiel]

I am curious, how did you use that quote tag? I don't understand how to use it.

Just hit the reply button at the bottom of whatever post it is you want to quote, and it'll show up in your text box with a complete set of quote tags, no need to monkey around with them.

Thanks, I think I got the hang of it.

---

Just hit the reply button at the bottom of whatever post it is you want to quote, and it'll show up in your text box with a complete set of quote tags, no need to monkey around with them.

Thanks, I think I got the hang of it.

I thought this was an interesting read;
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/12...59063.html