(October 18, 2010 at 5:48 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote:(October 18, 2010 at 5:35 pm)orogenicman Wrote:(October 18, 2010 at 4:49 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote:(October 18, 2010 at 3:35 pm)Tiberius Wrote:(October 18, 2010 at 2:45 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Not exactly. Can I answer this over in the "Balcony" thread?Why don't you just stick to the thread that was created for it? This forum doesn't revolve around you; we don't have to keep all topics in a single thread that you made.
Well actually I was trying to keep your forum neat and tidy for you. If you cannot recognize the courtesy of this gesture then whatever.
No you aren't. You are trying to control the discussion. This is a technique that creationists have tried to use on other forums, and it doesn't work because people aren't stupid. Try answering the question in the thread in which it is posted.
Well then Brontosaurus-boy, you will just have to be patient. It takes too much time to jump back and forth between threads, and I am focusing my attention on answering questions in "the Balcony" right now on Man's will. You will get an answer, I promise.
Nope, as I already explained, I am answering something else in a different thread right now. I offered to address this issue in that thread, he threw a fit. So I will answer this when I have the time, this is not a difficult topic (way less complicated that man's will) it's just very large and takes time. Kind of ironic how you would get on me for this though, considering you were standing up for someone earlier who just flat-out refused to debate Creationists. Different rules for different people I guess.
How can you be answering someone somewhere else if you are here posting your usual drivel? If you have time to post your usual drivel, you can certainly find the time to post a proper response.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
