(July 23, 2015 at 7:37 pm)Ace Wrote:(July 23, 2015 at 5:57 pm)Cato Wrote: That's a neat trick since Boeing absorbed McDonnell Douglas in the late 90s.
The idea that one day the law will allow homosexuals to be fucked over the way they have been is a fanciful dream. One reason is the trend in public opinion. From Gallup:
Another reason already discussed is the fact that it will have to pass strict scrutiny. Yet another reason is the fact that it would be a very thinly veiled attempt of pushing a religious prohibition where the prohibition by practice no longer exists. There won't be another opportunity to argue the silly procreative centric state interest bullshit again.
Your enthusiasm for your chances remind me of this:
I may be wrong but, I think that you completely and seriously misread and miss understood the last of section of my argument. I am saying that [i]the argument that Thena323[/i] made about the laws passed are set in stone, making any discussion of it irreverent and to move on, is a critical and erroneous argument to make.
I said, if this argument were to taken, [b]Thena323 argument NOT MINE[/b], then any current legal issue that the homosexuals communities are addressing to further their rights, ( Employment Laws, Housing Laws, Adoption Laws, and Insurance Company law) should be left alone. So no one are to fight these current legal issue, that were just mentioned, because the law that is in currently in place is set, (a done deal). Nothing can change it, (there’s not a goddamn thing bigoted assholes can do about it) so to even discuss the issue is irrelevant for anyone. Again this is [b]Thena323 argument NOT MINE[/b]
I am saying that NO LAW is ever a done deal (set in stone) and any law that is made about any issue does not make it any more or less permissible for anyone to talk about any law.
"Never forget laws are always being created, changed, and done away with. No Law is completely a done deal and yes they can changed by people who are still part of this country, (even the assholes)."
(July 23, 2015 at 5:57 pm)Cato Wrote: Another reason already discussed is the fact that it will have to pass strict scrutiny.
In you regards to your comment on passing strict scrutiny to deny a right, as it was said before, it is not bestow to Homosexuals because Homosexuality is NOT listed as a protected class. Only those that are listed as a protected class does strict scrutiny apply to . However, the funny thing is, religion listed is a protected class.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 29, 2025, 3:18 pm
Thread Rating:
MARRIAGE EQUALITY NATIONWIDE
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)