Tell us about the dinosaurs

[Statler Waldorf]

---

I don't remember which of you made that funny mistake. I just assume you all believe Brontosaurus was real.

That was you, Statler. Even little childrens' shows like 'Harry and his Bucketfull of Dinosaurs' don't make arsehat mistakes like that. >.>

Since the word "dinosaur" was not created until the 19th Century by Richard Owen (Creationist) I would not expect to see an ancient Hebrew word for it. However the word "dragon" is used numerious times in the Old Testament. It is used symbolically at times but also used when talking about everyday animals.

Your Achilles' heel has been bolded for your review and consideration. The Bible is not to be taken literally, it speaks figuratively, often containing metaphors rather than addressing what it is actually elaborating upon therefore open to anyone's interpretation. You can play semantics with us all day if you like: Dragons aren't dinosaurs.

If I ran into a dinosaur before the word dinosaur was created I probably would describe them as dragons as well.

What? Now you're just messing with us.

I am sure you are also aware that Creationists believe in speciation (sometimes more so than Evolutionists) so to point to one and pretend he believes in common descent without a Creator is dishonest. Still does not change the fact that a Creationists named your beloved Dinosaurs, ironic.

Still does not change the fact your beloved Creationist agreed with Darwin that evolution did actually occur. Such a shame.

Humans are only a species of primate because Evolutionists stuck them in that group based on their Evolutionairy ideas. So it does not prove anything that they are there.

You mean taxonomists - they established biological orders.

---

Is this a serious post? Someone needs to learn what "literal" means. Literal means that you interpret something according to the literary method it was written in. If it is a poem, you interpret it as a poem, if it is a metaphor you interpret it as a metaphor. It's not my fault you use the word incorrectly.

---

---

Humans are only a species of primate because Evolutionists stuck them in that group based on their Evolutionairy ideas. So it does not prove anything that they are there.

Again the creationist ape babbles whatever appears to him to set him apart from the apes. It is as if whatever seem to him to support his creation myth must by that property alone be near enough to the truth to disseminate.

In fact Statler Waldorf was placed in the ape family in classification system devised by Carl Linnæus - a creationist for there was no real choice at the time - in 1735. Evolution itself was not propounded by Darwin for another 124 years, in 1859.

I have to say that while I have no problems being in the ape family, I do rather resent the implication that I am somehow related within several thousand generations to creationists.

---

You are completely right, you are far more similiar to those poop chucking apes than you are to the civilized men known as Creationists.