(August 3, 2015 at 3:34 pm)Aristocatt Wrote: Ace, you have successfully misunderstood my entire argument.
My argument is that this idea of homosexuals being bad because they could cause extinction is dumb. I am using the basis of extinction from sexual orientation to show that every sexual orientation has the potential to destroy humanity.

Ok, got the point and. . . ? . . . ? . . .?
Hmm. . . I can see were it would be bad unto its self, if it can not produce its self, it is done with. So yea that is fucked.
As a hole, i can see were it dose not add to the numbers of people.
But I am not sure how that has to do with rights no one is saying they have no right.
I don't think Anima was saying that is why they should not have rights. Only their importance in the nature of the human race. The rights part of the argument has disappear in this discussion between you two because of each of you trying to define social or natures importance of its presents.
At lest that is what I got from the reading.