Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet

[Ace]

.


Yeah...and why do you think that isn't the case any more? Hmmm?

It's because we set the age of marital/sexual consent as being older than that once science could objectively show that people below a certain age are usually harmed by those kinds of relationships. That shit used to be legal, and now there are laws against it. That means that "legal precedence" could never be responsible for the re-legalization of child marriage. Legislation of some kind would be required.

True, and lets hope it stays that way, but their is a large group of people, (many have even advocated on this board) to end the statutory laws which are in place for teens around the ages 12 to 18.

That shit used to be legal, and now there are laws against it. That means that "legal precedence" could never be responsible for the re-legalization of child marriage.

Hahahah funny because homosexuals had used that very same argument: its was legal, semi legal in Greece or Rome; homosexuality has always been.
Also homosexuality was illegal once also, . . .and now . . .

Furthermore, virtually every society that condones/has condoned child marriage has been religious. Why are homosexuals and atheists being accused of sliding us down a slope toward child marriage when religious people have always been more prone toward that kind of exploitation? That's sort of like the kettle calling the bathtub "black."

hey, I was just responding to what was posted. Nothing more. . . .

But you do know that atheism is a very know concept and has not even has time to develop a history anywhere close to that of religious. So to say that atheists have never done anything bad to society, (which can be argued in regards to atheist proclaimed communist states) it not so correct knowing you have not have such a long time on the stage of humanity. Give it time, its human nature to fuck up