(August 10, 2015 at 5:45 pm)Yeauxleaux Wrote: I don't have anything to prove as I have not made any outlandish claims, pulled from my ass, about an acceptance of homosexuality leading to an acceptance of pedophilia, nor am I using any particular groups' rights purely to further my own bigoted views
You do not know my views. You only know my argument. Not everyone argues from a pathos or ethos perspective. Some of us endeavor to exercise logos.
(August 10, 2015 at 5:45 pm)Yeauxleaux Wrote: A child is not capable of making a rational decision about sex. They have limited understanding of what sex is, and the weight of a decision to have sex with somone. A pre-pubescent child is also not programmed to become sexually aroused, they physically can't with the limited stage of development of their sex organs.
Interesting So a child is not capable of making a rational decision about sex, but is capable of making a decision about the life and death of themselves and others? That does not make sense in the slightest. One is an action which will not result in the death of another while the other is.
(August 10, 2015 at 5:45 pm)Yeauxleaux Wrote: And again we're trying to argue "gay people can't procreate". I can procreate, I just can't do it with a member of the same sex. I want kids of my own? That can be arranged, I can get surrogacy or I can just have consensual sex with a woman and also have a man there to help me along. A child who has not yet reached puberty can not procreate, so your argument about being sexually attracted to what you can procreate with falls flat on that regard.
Bitch sit.
HA HA. Yes you can. And the State values your copulation with a woman via sex or dish.
I do not follow your comment on the sexual attraction related to procreation. Are you saying that people are attracted to children therefore attraction is not related to procreation? If so I just covered that in the explanation of pedophilia as a defective procreative evaluation.