Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet

[Anima]

So, you are an advocate for eugenics as well as a raging closeted homophobe. You can dress up your deeply-ingrained desire to murder teh gayz with as many 'considers' and 'hypotheticals' as you like, the fact remains you hold the belief that exterminating gay people simply for being gay is an option on the table.

First, I believe your initial comment was, "who are you to say they are defective?" I have presented the argument for why they may be considered defective from a genetic biological standpoint. Did you have an argument for how they are not defective from a genetic biological standpoint? If so I am happy to hear it.

Secondly, what person wants to have defective children? What society wants to have a defective populace? I am undoubtedly an advocate of not having defective children and people if possible. Hence, the primary goal is prevention. I am not an advocate of exterminating the gay; (particularly as such would mean I would be an advocate for killing my own sister; which I most certainly am not) however, this is not to say society will not do so. It has tried to cure, it is trying to integrate, if it cannot do either of those it will ostracize and if need be terminate. History bears this out for numerous groups, we may only hope it does not repeat itself with this group.

Third, what do you mean by exterminating gay people simply for being gay? That is like saying exterminating murderers for simply being murderers. By this I take it to mean you mean gay (or murderous) inclination or intentions. No one would ever be killed for something like as their inclination or intentions are not known beyond their particular person. Now when that inclination or intention manifests as an act then the society or state may determine if that act is beneficial, acceptable, or detrimental and proceed to endorse, endure, or eliminate that act accordingly.

Bullshit. It's to satisfy the intolerance of despondent wastes of carbon like yourself who are so at war with themselves they seek a way to reflect their own inadequacies on other people or groups. Always has been, and it always will be, despite your sugar-coating thanks to your total lack of spine to even articulate what you really want.

At war with themselves? I am not sure what you are referring to here. Are you talking about the higher rate of suicide among homosexuals than heterosexuals as an indicator of them being at war with themselves in regards to their homosexuality?

Or are you trying to say recognition of the reality is a manifestation of inadequacy? In which case this is another form of trying to say I am a bigot.