Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet

[Redbeard The Pink]

And your arguments are demonstrated fallacies at best and homophobic hate speech at worst, and it's gone on so long that nobody cares if you think you've won the argument. We're all just kind of tired about reading what a backward bigot you are.

Logical flaw in the arguments have yet to be presented.  No homophobic hate speech has been utilized.  Of course I
recognize you may not know the legal of definition of hate speech so let me help you out a bit.

Hate speech does not consist of speech which is undesirable or offensive.  Hate speech consists of speech which is either obscene (devoid of any value to public discourse) or incites others to violence against a particular group or person.

Under the 1st amendment speech which may even be considered offensive is protected if it is regard to a matter of public discourse (in this case homosexuality in society and law) and is in keeping with the forum of expression (in this case a public forum for the expression of opinions and ideas).

So at worst it will not even constitute hate speech.

By all means I am more than happy to hear arguments in their favor.  I trust these arguments shall not be predicated on fallacies (as you claim mine are).  I have repeatedly asked for them.  

So what are you arguments in favor of their condition not being classified as a defect and in their favor not predicated on a fallacy of false equivalency?

I'm not going to dignify that last question with a response, you bigoted little shit.

Your definition of hate speech includes your "last resort" talk of exterminating them because you think they have a defect, fuckwallet. You're so ignorant it makes me go cross-eyed.