(August 10, 2015 at 2:10 pm)Tonus Wrote:Again, Gen 1 is a summary. A flawless overview of 13 billion years of natural history in just one page written some 3 tya, and miraculous describes the sequential steps (which aligns perfectly with the scientifically record) by which Earth became ready for human habitation. Gen 2 like all other references adds details to the summary. Gen 2 in particular gives a spiritual perspective on creation; thus, it begins to elaborate on ‘purpose’ of creation. The frame of reference (FOR) changes to a small portion of Earth’s surface (Eden) from the vantage point of one human being in that location; whereas, the ‘FOR’ in Gen 1 is about the Earth’s surface. Also, Gen 2 unlike Gen 1 isn’t written in a time ordered sequence since the purpose has changed from the physical to the ‘why’ of the physical.(August 8, 2015 at 12:11 am)snowtracks Wrote: Gen 1 is a chronological summary account of the major creation events spanning some 13 billion years.
Gen 2 starts with a ref. to when God shaped the earth and the heavens but from that point forward, it begins to elaborate on the ‘why’ or ‘purpose’ of creation.
This is the apologist's attempt to square the two accounts, but it doesn't work. The two creation accounts are not complementary explanations of the same events. They differ on some fundamental points. In the first account, the humans are created together; in the second account, they are separate creations. In the first account, the human pair get their directions straight from god; in the second account only the man gets instructions direct from god. In the first account they are given the fruit of all of the plants and trees on Earth as food; in the second account they are only given the trees of the garden with an additional exception. In the first account they are given all of the animals to rule over, yet the story following the first account is how an animal deceived the woman into breaking god's single commandment to them.
It is more realistic to think that the person who wrote the second account had either never read the first account or had possibly only heard some details of it. He makes no attempt to make the two accounts similar; he is writing his own story and he is writing it about a very different god.
--------------------------------
Quote: In the first account, the humans are created together; in the second account, they are separate creations. In the first account, the human pair get their directions straight from god
--------------------------------
Gen 1 says “God created male and female” (The ‘summary’ doesn’t say created simultaneously).
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.