(August 19, 2015 at 4:58 am)robvalue Wrote: Scientific version of good and bad?
These are both arbitrary, ultimately. There is no inherent good or bad. I'm really not sure what point you're trying to make, sorry If you define good, bad and morality so that they are not linked, then they are not linked, yeah.
Scientifically, morality is the study of how and why people value each other. There is no doubt that they do, in general. Breaking it down at an individual level is something totally different, and you appear to be conflating the two.
I am just on the quest for truth here and wish to find the answer to my theory. I wish to understand how a person who has no incentive to live can still have good meaning in his/her life and can still live a good life.