Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet

[Ace]

Unlike you, I don't get my panties in a twist over people marrying each other.  If you seriously can't see the difference between marriage equality and issues that have real-world impact like ISIS or nuclear proliferation, then you're right that I was wrong to play the special needs card.  You are clearly not in their league.

Haha you may not get you panties twisted when gays marry ( like my self) but you sure do get very twisted, bent out of shap, and bitchy as hell when any opposition to the issue is mentioned.

Now if we are to argue the "world impact" issue. Then let us take a look ISIS. It is only present in the Middle East, and even that can be argued further down that they are only in a particular region of the Middle East. Now will the world be impacted because of its existences? Well first such a position can not be really taken into account, because that my friend ends up being you hated slippery slop argument that you never want to make, because we truly do not know the future. If I was to look at history as an example of past tyrants, most tyrants tend to stay in there own area and not effect other people around them per say. This can be seen in China, Vietnam,Cuba, Cambodia, North Korea, Indonesia, the Sha of Iran, the I'O Tola, USSR, with some exemptions. So it might be more likely to be see As another "evil state" that we will sanction and refuse to talk to and boo in the media and the world stage. Like we do with the ones now. So no real world impact occurred per say.

Nuclear issue, agin the slippery slop argument that the world will be bad if another country has nuclear capability. This has be historically argued when Russia, China, India, and Pakistan go there nuk's, not so much Isreal because they obtained it in secrecy. ( haha hey a little simalarty there, Iran secrecy for nuk's, Israel secrecy for nuk's) hmmm?
Yet, no nuclear war has erupted. Now the only country in history to ever use to big boom was the United States. So again if we use history as an example, no American nations that achieve nuclear capability has ever use it, Only the American country of the U.S. Of A.
Thus it is far more logical to to fear and have concern at the nation that has a history of using it then nations that have it but have never used it.
So the nuclear deal will more then like just be another nation with nuk's and nothing more. No real world effecting event.