(August 25, 2015 at 6:35 pm)Rhythm Wrote: An advocate of what, equality? Sort of goes with the territory for me. We hold these truths to be self evident - recall the line? You know, they might not see the need to seek protected status.......if they weren't roundly and openly discriminated against, food for thought. I told you I wan;t actually interested in arguing your "arguments", I'm just looking for the executive summary.
Gays are different things for "reasons" - your reasons don't concern me one single iota.
Gays are inferior for "reasons" - your reasons don't concern me one single iota.
The state has an interest in discriminating against those different, inferior gays for "reasons" - your reasons don't concern me one single iota.
I just want to give you as many opportunities as possible to repeat those claims, in as many forms as you can imagine, and I made that clear from the start, did I not? So it doesn't matter "what is argued", because there's no one on this end to argue against. Is my summary inaccurate? Is this not your position?
So why bother asking questions and responding? Hell just stop, or are you not free to do so for some reason. No one is forcing anyone to be on this thread or even read it. It is of you own action that you choose to do. Thus why be irritated by Anima's post is because of your own action of engaging it. If you actually stop so would the irritation. Or is it that you are just born to always act even if it irritates you?
