Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet

[Iroscato]

And what proof do you have to make such a clam? How are you so certain that one thing will not lead to the other? Faith? Sorry but that I do not have for such an issue.

Because homosexuality requires the informed consent of both adult parties. Paedophilia by definition cannot, because one of the one of the parties is not capable of giving informed consent. That's it. End of story. It's not faith that leads me to that conclusion.

Because it is so impossible that it is not even possible?

Correct. Backwards fucked-up religious shitholes are the ones that give the OK to fuck kids, not civilised nations. They also execute gay people. Countries in the west do not. So as long as we do the precise opposite of what they do, we can't go wrong.

 . . . . Truly, can you sit back and say beyond confidences the 10 years ago you know with out a doubt that homosexuality would ever be at the level of acceptance it is now in today's society.

I was 11 ten years ago, but even then I could see the winds of change happening. So yes, quite easily I can say I saw it coming a mile off. I'm really surprised you couldn't.

Be   Truly Honest, with your self. Would you have every image homosexual acceptance and marriage today??

Read above.

Keep in mind that 10 years ago public oppenion polls were deeply against it, the majority of people did not accept it. It was view as a repulsive deviant act. It was illegal to engage in homosexual sex.  Can you honestly say the you know that this would be the outcome of homosexuality today in our society 10 years ago??

Read above the read above.


TL;DR - you're a delusional twit with absofuckinglutely nothing of value to add. So on the ignore list you go, ta-ta.