Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet

[Anima]

So states geneology.  Well if they had kids using their own genetic material that is.

I'm guessing you failed biology.  You see.... a gay couple can't have children.  And plenty of straight couples have gay children.  So where are these gay children coming from exactly?  Also you're freely admitting that being gay isn't a choice.

I did not fail biology. As evidence by my recognition of:

1. Your bigoted contention that homosexuals may not have children (which they have repeatedly stated in this thread they can). Now if they can and do have children utilizing their own genetic material than it is likely the geneological variation leading to their orientation will be inherited by the next generation, resulting in the manifestation of homosexuality at a greater rate than that of a simple defect. Which is something we should like to avoid as the geneological variation in question is not adaptive.

2. Arguing gay couples do not have gay children, but straight couples do serves now purpose than to illustrate that homosexuality is a genetic defect. In may not be said to be an inherited trait from the heterosexual geneology of the parents thus it must be a genetic mutation/abnormality in the offspring which is not inherited from the sire. The mutation/abnormality is recognized as defective and once again should be avoided or eliminated if possible.

3. I am taking the argument under the idea that homosexual orientation is not a choice. This is not the same as to say the actions to which those so orientated are not a choice. However, I will not admit because one has an orientation or tendency to engage in a particular action that they should or that society should sanction such action. To take such an argument would be to say those born with the disposition to murder, rape, necophilia, pedophilia, kleptomania, and so forth should not only be allowed to engage in such action, but should be granted state sanctions to engage in such actions.