(August 26, 2015 at 5:36 pm)Rhythm Wrote: If polygamy is accepted then polygamy is accepted..whats the problem? If polygamy were acceptable (it isn;t?) then you';d what....go get some extra husbands? If incest is accepted then incest is accepted, whats the problem? You'd diddle your siblings?
Why stop there? Keep going, keep going, you'll get there. You want to make the line of relationships should be accepted and which should not be. You say no if the line is only drawn straight and narrow for hederalsexual couple. The argument has been that it should not only be fore them but for us as well, regardless if they want it or not.
You want the line to be felxable, were it accepts you, and you are ok if other's like polygamy and incest that you don't mind, be allowed in as well. But, when the one's you don't want wants in, you now take the position of the hetero position from the begging and what to draw the line and say "No more, only us." But why? Who are you to say no and why should the other think about what you want or like into account? You had no problem with telling the hetero, "tough shit!" "What you want does not mean shit to me!" So why can the other sexual preferences say the say to you? "Tough shit!" " What you want does not mean shit to me!"
No, this line of acceptation a is either felxable or it is not, like they say you can't have it both ways.
You say well the difference is age of conceit , yet I already presented you with 3 different bills that are trying to be passed in some states and that the federal government has give legally protection to pedo's,(under a hate crime bill name after a gay man who was better and killed at that) and neither took into account of the age of conceit.
