(August 26, 2015 at 5:36 pm)Rhythm Wrote: If polygamy is accepted then polygamy is accepted..whats the problem? If polygamy were acceptable (it isn;t?) then you';d what....go get some extra husbands? If incest is accepted then incest is accepted, whats the problem? You'd diddle your siblings?
Why stop there? Keep going, keep going, you'll get there.
You has this " line of relationships" drawn, with one side marked for those who should be accepted and which should not be. You say no if the line is only drawn for accepting heterosexual couples. The gay community has argued that it should not only be fore hetero's but for us as well, regardless if they want it or not.
You want the line to be felxable, were it accepts homosexuality and because you are not so opposed if other's like polygamy and incest, should be allowed in as well. But, when the one's you don't want wants in, now the potion is taken,( which was the hetero position from the begging) were you now what to draw the line and say "No more, only us."
But why? Who are you to say no and why should the other sexual preferences even think about what you want or like into account? You had no problem with telling the hetero, "tough shit!" "What you want does not mean shit to me!" So why can the other sexual preferences say the same to you? "Tough shit!" " What you want does not mean shit to me!"
No, this line of acceptance a is either felxable or it is not. Like they say, you can't have it both ways.
You say well the differences is age of conceit , yet I already presented you with 3 different bills that do not even take into account of the age of conceit and argue that because "homosexuals have been accepted it is now time to" . . . . 2; that wish to legalize pedo's and 1; that provided legal protection (under a hate crime bill that is even named after two gay men who were killed). There have already been 4 court cases where it has been ruled that an underage kid can legally give consent to engage in sexual activity with an adult. Again there age not being taken into account but their personal actions.