Ask a Catholic

[Wyrd of Gawd]

---

Don't forget this..

There was no need for the daughters to copulate with their disgusting old drunk dad. They weren't the only people on the planet and they all knew this. In reality the girls would be pushing to go an a road trip not fuck their elderly father.

Did you see the words I Highlighted in blue?
Women were not considered the carriers of lineage, only males, because at the time the ignorant goatfuckers thought that men planted baby seeds in women and that their womb was just fertile soil for the seed to grow in. We know that this is not true today. A woman's egg provides half the DNA of the baby and Lot's "LINEAGE" would have passed through his daughters anyway even if they hadn't procreated with their father. The whole story is shit.

Care to try and "OWN" me with a reply?

Sure.

AGAIN, you display your ignorance of a story which has been set before you just a few posts ago. The passage I quoted explains the daughters' motivation:

Genesis 19
31 One day the older daughter said to the younger, “Our father is old, and there is no man around here to give us children—as is the custom all over the earth. 32 Let’s get our father to drink wine and then sleep with him and preserve our family line through our father.”

Clearly, the daughters felt a road trip was not an option and no other men were around. So much for that stupid idea.

And the lineage of Jews is passed through the mother, not the father. You can find this on any number of websites; I chose this one:

The original and current Jewish definition of a born Jew is someone whose mother is Jewish. Even though the Torah forbids a Jewish woman to marry a Gentile man, if she does, her children will still be Jewish.

The Torah also forbids a Jewish man to marry a Gentile woman, and if he does, his children by that woman will not be Jewish.

[Source.] [And here.] [And here.]

---

Although Lot lived prior to Isaac and Jacob (Judah), the idea of matriarchal lineage was apparently established before Judah fathered the twelve sons who would be the heads of the Twelve Tribes of Israel. So much for your second stupid idea.



This isn't really going very well for you, brakeman. As I said, you doubled-down, and now you look even more ignorant.

Does it ever occur to you that you really don't know what you're talking about? It should.

So what was all of that BS that the Lord told Abram in Genesis chapter 12 about Abram being the big frog in the little pond?  Why didn't the Lord make Sarai the big frog?