(August 30, 2015 at 2:51 am)Neimenovic Wrote: Ace. You didn't respond. Are you saying that adults can now legally have sex with children, or that steps are taken in that direction?
How did you link it with same sex marriage? All of the court rulings you gave happened much before the SCOTUS decision
Oh I am sorry, It is easy to miss postings between other posting.
ok, I so do not want to say yes but, legal precedent set.
I am hoping that other cases dealing with the same issue will not use these rulings. However, when one is fighting not to get in trouble one tends to look for any thing to keep them for having to be punished for the trouble.
I want to say that steps are being taken that way, but they are big ones that are already showing their effect. ( I am so not happy with even saying that! I want so say no so bad! But if I am look at this from out side the box. . . . .man . . .yes. . . I have to say yes.)
(I was having such a good morning)
I am well aware of large group of people who are fighting to under Statutory Rape laws, because many are think of something that occurred to the personally or when teens engage sexually with each other. But keep in mind that now the 45 year old teacher can have legal consensual sex with a 12 year old, or a 35 with a 15, and so on.
Also many people do not see that if you do away with statutory law you can now try the teen as an adult.
To consent is to make a verbal agreement, contracts can be made both in written and verbal agreement. Under state law, (were legal contract issue are decided) only an adult can enter into a legal contract. But if the teen can now consent, consent is considered also a verbal agreement thus a contract. If the teen can enter into a contract then legally they are presented as an adult. If an adult now the can be tried as an adult.
(let me send this first to you. I am writing the second part now, but I don't want to keep you waiting more then you have to)
Part I.
