I'm still an atheist, but...

[Esquilax]

(Saying "we've heard it all before" is not a relevant response since I did not ask whether you thought I had posted anything original but whether I had posted anything that you judged to be a good argument.)

If we've heard it all before and are still atheists, isn't it reasonable to conclude that we've also recognized the problems with the arguments we've heard before, which therefore cannot be good arguments?

Feel free to insert your own objections, inadequate rebuttals, etc. in the space below. (I probably won't believe you since it's not likely you were honest originally.)

How did you determine we weren't honest? You empower yourself to just dictate to us our own positions so often, but when it comes to offering more than just the bare assertion, when you're actually asked to support your intimations, you never do. You seem to just want to discount what everyone says by fiat, but surely you can see how transparently self serving all these baseless accusations of malevolence really are?