(September 4, 2015 at 3:25 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:(September 4, 2015 at 3:15 pm)Divinity Wrote: You really don't see a difference between the two?
In one scenario, you have a stupid fucking bitch refusing to comply with a law that grants people their rights. The stupid bitch was given EVERY opportunity to avoid jail time. She was told as long as she didn't interfere with her co-workers issuing the licenses, she wouldn't go to jail. But the stupid cunt said no. It's against her religious beliefs. So she gets to decide for the entire county that the supreme court is wrong, and she's not going to hand out marriage licenses. Apparently this is 'standing up for your beliefs' according to some. What it really is -- standing up for bigotry.
In the other scenario you have someone who is trying to disobey the law because it deprives someone of rights they may not have by law, but should fucking have anyway.
Civil Disobedience has it's time and place. This isn't one of them. The fucking cunt should be thrown in jail for refusing to comply with an order that gives other their rights, and doesn't interfere a fucking bit with her own rights.
No law was actually passed. SCOTUS rulings are NOT the law. The Constitution of the United Sates is the law. Instead what we have is 5 black robes finding a right to habitual sodomy in a document that says exactly nothing about marriage period. You're a hypocritical anti-Christian bigot who justifies tyranny in pursuit of your progressive utopia.
What the fuck do you care if two guys want to cornhole each other?!? You ass-clowns make it sound like allowing gay people to have the same fucking rights that you have will bring on the end of the world. Isn't the end of the world what you're all fucking waiting and hoping for anyway?!?
For fucks sake you christers act like the SCOTUS has taken something away from you. They haven't
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
