Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet

[Ace]

Why can't we allow a person to amputate their arms??

Many time when a person wishes to have a type of mutation to one's body, the argument is that their could be other issues. Now if it is proven that they are in the right state of mind, keep in mind that the "assumed right" to self harm is not legal and in any governmental society the people are never their own rulers of himself but is a citizen of the state.

Also the Hippocratic oath . . .a doctor is charged to "do no harm"

Why do you think you should get to decide what is moral, just, negative, right or wrong for other people?

Under the same thought that others have in what they think they have a right to do what they want and have an extreme fault assuming that it does not affect others including myself.

When an adult person who is mentally competent wants to do something that affect no one else but that person, then they should be allowed to do it. The only time anyone should be allowed to intervene is if the person is a child, is not mentally competent, or what they're doing affects someone other than themself.

Hahaha I think it will scare you if you actually know how much society and the government can and does intervene in everyone's life. Like it or not.

So one can self harm? Hmm? interesting? Keep in mind that some people actually like to hurt them self and see nothing wrong with it. i.e. the lady known as "cat women" because of all the f-up surgery she has hand on her face. Which she still wish to have more done to her but, outrageously is denied the right to do so. Hmmm?

Also what are you counting as affecting another person? right when the act occurred, a month from then, a couple of years, what? Because affects can and do take some times to reveal them self