Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 24, 2025, 7:20 pm
Atheist Forums › Discussion › The Arts v
Rolling Stones or Beatles

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Rolling Stones or Beatles
A Theist Offline
Senior Member
****
Religious Views: Backslid Pentecostal Christian and Forum Agitator
Posts: 3522
Threads: 165
Joined: November 17, 2009
Reputation: 27
#10
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles
November 12, 2010 at 7:12 pm (This post was last modified: November 12, 2010 at 7:13 pm by A Theist.)
(November 12, 2010 at 10:22 am)Darwinian Wrote: Neither, they're both rubbish Panic Old peoples music :p
Old peoples' music! That's not old peoples' music. This is old peoples' music...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95aP0OWx4jY

"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"

[Image: freddy_03.jpg]

Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Discussion › The Arts v
Rolling Stones or Beatles

Messages In This Thread
Rolling Stones or Beatles - by A Theist - November 12, 2010 at 9:43 am
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by Paul the Human - November 12, 2010 at 9:56 am
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by Rev. Rye - November 12, 2010 at 11:11 pm
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by leo-rcc - November 12, 2010 at 10:20 am
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by Darwinian - November 12, 2010 at 10:22 am
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by Minimalist - November 12, 2010 at 12:52 pm
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by A Theist - November 12, 2010 at 7:12 pm
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by thesummerqueen - November 12, 2010 at 7:31 pm
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by padraic - November 23, 2010 at 12:49 am
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by ib.me.ub - November 12, 2010 at 10:23 am
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by Tiberius - November 12, 2010 at 10:23 am
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by Skipper - November 12, 2010 at 12:33 pm
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by Jaysyn - November 12, 2010 at 2:25 pm
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by Minimalist - November 12, 2010 at 8:12 pm
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by A Theist - November 13, 2010 at 8:37 am
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by lilyannerose - November 22, 2010 at 7:05 pm
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by Justtristo - November 24, 2010 at 5:59 am
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by thesummerqueen - November 26, 2010 at 8:08 pm
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by padraic - November 27, 2010 at 4:36 am
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by downbeatplumb - November 27, 2010 at 5:18 am
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by The Skeptic - January 6, 2011 at 1:42 pm
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles - by padraic - January 9, 2011 at 1:25 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Benatar did a cover of the Beatles... Brian37 0 594 February 23, 2019 at 4:05 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Styx and stones well just Styx...... Brian37 15 1980 August 6, 2017 at 4:38 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  ☆ The Beatles Thread ☆ PhilosophicalZebra 13 2721 April 22, 2015 at 5:45 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)