(September 21, 2015 at 7:57 am)Ace Wrote:(September 14, 2015 at 1:10 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: I'm currently arguing a case of substantive Due Process rights violations (under state statute-granted Liberty Interest rights and independently under the EPC) before the US Supreme Court, . . .
Sorry for the delay, work is work and take much of my time.
Before I full responded to you in depth response, I have a question. You have a case before the US (United States of America) Supreme Court? Supreme Court that is under Chief Justice Judge John Roberts right now?! What is the name of the case and when will it be heard?
Are you a lawyer or the plaintiff in the case?
Petitioner. I filed a pro se case while still incarcerated, including my petition to SCotUS, but I now have an attorney who is handling the case.
The case is set to be heard next month. I don't wish to give out more specifics because I am also (through the attorney) engaged in a civil suit against the county that falsely incarcerated me, and my attorney instructed me not to discuss it before everything is disposed of.
And, yes, under Chief Justice Roberts. And Scalia and Thomas, who worry me a lot more than Roberts does.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.