(November 17, 2010 at 1:39 pm)Cerrone Wrote:(November 17, 2010 at 11:52 am)Dotard Wrote:(November 17, 2010 at 10:50 am)Cerrone Wrote: ...its racism in reverse.
I find this term, reverse racism, quite annoying. There is NO SUCH THING as 'reverse racism' or 'racism in reverse'. Racism is racism, period. There is no 'forward' or 'reverse'.
I know that does not really add a thing to the discussion, it's just a pet-peeve of mine.
It's a true statement though, like Josh Goldberg said in the post before,
Quote:well are black,gay and even women treated equally as white hetrosexual men in societyand i think he meant that as a rhetorical question.
So he believes that white heterosexual men should be allowed no kind of feeling of any self worth whatsoever because they're not black, gay or women. So its.. racism/gender politics in reverse, like feminists beleiving they're pioneering gender equality, hwen all they're really doing is replacing one dominant subcateogory of human with another.. and that ain't equality or tolerance.
gays cant marry and civil partnerships are homophobic,blacks are on average poorer than whites,blacks make up 62% of prison population america even though their 12% of the usa population,there have been cases of men being paid more than women whilst doing the same type of job,99% of rapes are men on women.