RE: Apologetics open challenge
September 25, 2015 at 5:19 pm
(This post was last modified: September 25, 2015 at 5:20 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
Just to recap:
RV: Please post any arguments about religion or a general God that you think are valid, and I will analyse them.
CW: I return your challenge with another: a formal debate of the 5 Ways of Thomas Aquinas.
RV: Well, it's chock full of logical fallacies (the 5 ways), and I can point them all out if you want...What else is there to say?... If you don't want to address these points here, and think this is really worth a debate, I'll consider it.
CW: I think a formal debate would best serve to illustrate the robust nature of Thomas Aquinas’s Five Ways…if you decline I will not consider it a sign of weakness or lack of courage, merely a recognition that we all have personal lives...I invite you to select one of the Five Ways and present your best objection to it now.
RV: I'm taking a break from heavy going topics for a few days as I get all obsessed with them sometimes. I'll be back to read the replies here in a while and reply to people.
CW: As for now, my counter-challenge to either formally debate the 5W has been tacitly declined and my offer to defend any of the 5W selected by the skeptics has gone unanswered. Will any skeptics step up to the plate?
RS Meme: “I saw your last post…would you like some cheese to go with your whine.”
CW: I have issued my counter-challenge at least three times now. You skeptical cock-lepers have only offered a cute meme… If anyone is serious about fulfilling the empty boast of the OP then you can PM me.
RS: Don't be sad, Chad. I just don't take you very seriously.
RV: I said I'm taking a break, as above. But as you're so incredibly rude, I've lost all interest in interacting with you.
RV: Please post any arguments about religion or a general God that you think are valid, and I will analyse them.
CW: I return your challenge with another: a formal debate of the 5 Ways of Thomas Aquinas.
RV: Well, it's chock full of logical fallacies (the 5 ways), and I can point them all out if you want...What else is there to say?... If you don't want to address these points here, and think this is really worth a debate, I'll consider it.
CW: I think a formal debate would best serve to illustrate the robust nature of Thomas Aquinas’s Five Ways…if you decline I will not consider it a sign of weakness or lack of courage, merely a recognition that we all have personal lives...I invite you to select one of the Five Ways and present your best objection to it now.
RV: I'm taking a break from heavy going topics for a few days as I get all obsessed with them sometimes. I'll be back to read the replies here in a while and reply to people.
CW: As for now, my counter-challenge to either formally debate the 5W has been tacitly declined and my offer to defend any of the 5W selected by the skeptics has gone unanswered. Will any skeptics step up to the plate?
RS Meme: “I saw your last post…would you like some cheese to go with your whine.”
CW: I have issued my counter-challenge at least three times now. You skeptical cock-lepers have only offered a cute meme… If anyone is serious about fulfilling the empty boast of the OP then you can PM me.
RS: Don't be sad, Chad. I just don't take you very seriously.
RV: I said I'm taking a break, as above. But as you're so incredibly rude, I've lost all interest in interacting with you.
