RE: Josh Feuerstein goes on TV and gets roasted.
September 27, 2015 at 1:35 pm
(This post was last modified: September 27, 2015 at 1:36 pm by TheRocketSurgeon.)
(September 27, 2015 at 1:08 pm)Chad32 Wrote: I've seen Josh in the Armored Skeptic videos. Recently he complained about a guy letting his son pick an Ariel (little mermaid) doll instead of something more traditionally male oriented, and decided to train his kids how to use a pistol as an example of what he thinks is a good idea for little kids to do. The guy is a nut.
Funnily enough I didn't know the linked video would be about the issue with the doll.
Yeah I saw that video of him with his kids and the gun.
The "dead-eyed" look of the son, who had obviously been pulled hard by his leash by that overbearing psychopath of a dad, terrifies me. Truly. The damage religion does to young minds...
As far as him not being "owned" by the Doctors, I think they're well aware that much of their TV audience will be Christian housewives stuck at home in the midweek afternoons, and aren't looking to alienate anyone. Religion, as we well know, must be treated with kid gloves even while being struck down in arguments.
(Otherwise the headline would have been about the anti-Christian atheist Doctors.)
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
