Do we really need to even address the idea that a man came back from the dead after being tortured and murdered through the stages of crucifixion? At what point does a claim become so absurd that it can just be dismissed outright? It seems to me that the resurrection crosses this line. It doesn't even deserve to be refuted.
Even if you could prove the tomb was empty and that he actually came back to life, who is to say that it wasn't done by aliens with hyper-advanced technology, right?
Even if you could prove the tomb was empty and that he actually came back to life, who is to say that it wasn't done by aliens with hyper-advanced technology, right?
![[Image: tnajakqqwuxaqinwvcwb.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.kinja-img.com%2Fgawker-media%2Fimage%2Fupload%2Ftnajakqqwuxaqinwvcwb.jpg)
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell