Is the Atheism/Theism belief/disbelief a false dichotomy? are there other options?

[Psychonaut]

---

---

Are you saying that a person can be uncertain consciously, and certain subconsciously?

No.  I am not saying that one is certain of anything.  I am saying that one is or is not a theist.  Just like I either have cancer or I do not have cancer.  What anyone knows about either is irrelevant to those facts.

Simultaneously?

Also, how do you know that there is no middle ground?

Because I understand the concept of negation, which is the common use of the word "not" in English.  To say:

Not X.

means anything other than X.  There is no "middle ground," because "Not X" is anything that isn't X.

Thus, I can be absolutely certain of the following sentence:

Either you are a theist or you are not a theist.

There is no middle ground because "not a theist" covers absolutely everything other than being a theist.

Are you then saying that a person believes or disbelieves, regardless of whether they are certain about it or not? As in, it is a matter of fact that a person is either X or not X? Regardless of their experience of such? I understand that you are using the concept of negation, and by definition, 
Not X means "everything other than X" but I don't think we have enough certainty to know whether or not "X or not X" statements about most things reflect reality. 

I'm not certain, but I think we're taking this from different angles. I think experience is key to belief, as I have never been aware of believing while I have not been experiencing. 

Sorry, it may seem ridiculous that I'm essentially regurgitating what you say, but I'm genuinely trying to understand your views on this, I don't want to misread what you've said.

I also understand that it may seem silly, and essentially pointless that I am question every basic and seemingly self evident assumption that one has about reality, but I cannot help but see things this way.

If I am mistaken, please let me know.