(November 23, 2010 at 12:25 pm)orogenicman Wrote: There was no strawman in what I posted. It directly addressed a portion of your response, as I've outlined ...
No, it directly addressed what you hear "most Christians" arguing every day, which is certainly a straw man because it absolutely is different from what I argue: "Where did I ever suggest anecdotal evidence is scientific? Nowhere. Where did I ever suggest that one's anecdotal evidence should be persuasive for someone else? Again, nowhere. Where did I ever suggest that science does, or even should, rely on anecdotes as evidence of anything? Once again, nowhere."
If you want to address what "most Christians" say to you (or within earshot of you) and ignore what I actually said, go ahead. But don't pretend it has any relevance to me.
orogenicman Wrote:You really ought to learn to control your temper, dude.
What temper? The swearing? Good grief, what sort of anal retentive upbringing did you have that swearing is an indication of anger? In the great big world beyond your uptight notions, some people swear for emphasis, or out of frustration, etc., without any temper or anger at all. Seriously. Get out of the basement sometime and see.
orogenicman Wrote:So you were saying that the idea of testing for the existence of God is a non-starter? Odd. It appeared to me that you were arguing just the opposite.
Glad it finally sank in for you.
orogenicman Wrote:But hey, if you don't believe that one can devise a test to verify the existence of God, then our arguments aren't so far apart after all.
Oh please, dude, our arguments could not possibly get any further apart. Mine are rational, for starters.
orogenicman Wrote:No, sir. I submit to you that you dismiss what I post because you can't post a level headed rebuttal.
Your delusional submission is noted.
orogenicman Wrote:I suspect that my grasp of the Christian religion is at least as good as anyone else's ...
Yeah? Give us some reason to think that's true by answering your bolded question.
(November 24, 2010 at 9:12 am)rjh4 Wrote: I resent the e-mail that you previously did not answer, along with another a couple of days ago. Is your e-mail working?
Yes, sir—but then so was I (working). I've been quite swamped for the last while. I respond to emails and here when I can. I've since written you back.
Man is a rational animal who always loses his temper when
called upon to act in accordance with the dictates of reason.
(Oscar Wilde)
called upon to act in accordance with the dictates of reason.
(Oscar Wilde)