RE: Sweet story...
October 10, 2015 at 7:23 pm
(This post was last modified: October 10, 2015 at 7:28 pm by TheRocketSurgeon.)
(October 10, 2015 at 7:05 pm)MTL Wrote:(October 10, 2015 at 6:47 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote:
....and that's basically what I was guilty of, just now...lumping the Acadiens in together with Québécois for the sake of making a point. So I apologize....because it's really not okay.
Yes, I know the story and I can tell you, even though you might laugh at me, that it brought real tears to my eyes when I read the story for the first time. It's a sad story. I know the Acadiens were trying to escape the religious strife in France, and traveling across the ocean back then was a miserable endeavor, most of the time; many didn't survive the trip for one of many reasons.
To then find the absolutely stunning coastal landscapes of (what is now) the State of Maine, and the province of Nova Scotia, must have seemed indeed wonderful, if extremely challenging to them....but with lots of fertile soil, rich hunting and fishing grounds, they did very well there, and, as you observed, got on well with the Mi'kmaq;
but to then be forced by the British to either assimilate or have their property confiscated, (or be killed or imprisoned), and be shipped either back to the UK, France, or to the Bayou of Louisiana, hot, and infested with mosquitoes, cottonmouth snakes, gators...challenging, to say the least...but not only did they survive, but they became one of the most distinctive populations in American history.
I watched a recent documentary about the Acadiens still living in Maine, and they were later persecuted by the KKK, as if they hadn't been through enough already (and as if they weren't there long before the KKK, or even America, as a Nation, existed, anyway)
Apparently many Acadien Americans living in Maine, today, even if they know the story of Le Grand Dérangement, do not really identify so much as Acadiens, as they do "Americans", obviously...whereas I believe the cultural identity of the "Cajuns" of Louisiana is significantly more entrenched, by comparison.
I know that the Acadiens living on the North Shore of Nova Scotia have quite a strong sense of their identity,
and I believe there is even a periodic memorial or pilgrimage observed to mark Le Grand Dérangement;
but while a common history is shared and understood, I believe they really have a different identity, today, than the Cajuns of Louisiana, or even the Acadiens living in Maine. It's curious.
And today, many Acadiens from Nova Scotia have blended into Québec and New Brunswick, as well, although of course they know their distinctive heritage.
My mother, who has her PhD in Cajun theatrical storytelling and history from LSU, just went to the Nova Scotian gathering of Acadiens, a few months back. (I'd have to ask her when she went; I don't recall.) She goes every few years as an invitee because she does a character called The Cajun Lady, and tells The Cajun Night Before Christmas in full accent and regalia, as well as a great many anecdotes and stories and jokes. She's quite popular. Of course, she speaks on more serious, scholarly stuff, too.
You might enjoy watching this:
Edit to Add: Ugh, that guy's accent isn't very good. He sounds like one of the city-folk over in Baton Rouge. Below is a link to another (non-standard) version of a Cajun Night Before Christmas, re-written and unfamiliar to me, but told in a more realistic Louisiana accent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2Dd-_Xke1k
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.